SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News ‘Indian MF industry is the most transparent’

    ‘Indian MF industry is the most transparent’

    A Morningstar report found that India was the only country that disclosed fund manager’s remuneration.
    Rosevina Gonsalves Oct 17, 2017

    Although India stands alongside US in terms of mutual fund disclosures, it earns a top grade for disclosing the fund manager’s remuneration, states Morningstar’s recent report titled, ‘Global Fund Investor Experience Report 2017’.

    The report grades the experience of mutual fund investors in 25 countries across North America, Europe, Asia and Africa.

    Thanks to SEBI’s regulatory norms, India scores over US in terms of better mutual fund disclosure policies. The report says, “Disclosure in India earns a Top grade. Transparency of portfolio holdings remains the best of any market, with monthly disclosure required and those portfolios typically released after 10 days. It is now mandatory for asset managers to disclose fund manager compensation levels as well as manager investments in their funds. Regulations have also been introduced requiring the disclosure of commissions earned by distributors. Point-of-sale documents include details around fund risks, but our analysts observe that the descriptions of investment strategies are often insufficient.”

    India currently follows the best fund disclosure norms according to Morningstar Analyst. Sharing some improvement tips, Kaustubh Belapurkar, Director- Fund Research, Morningstar said, “In terms of disclosures, we are ahead of many major markets. However, we can level up our disclosure standards by making a few more changes. For instance, AMFI currently publishes Quarterly AUM of fund houses data, it could instead publish it share class level AUM data monthly for more transparency. Also, the recent categorization of the mutual fund schemes will now make investment mandates more clear for investors.”

    While the US is the most investor friendly market, India has retained an overall grade of ‘Average’ in terms of investor friendly market, said the report.

    The report further highlights that investment advice has improved over time. It attributes the improvement to a range of initiatives starting from Investment Advisory Regulations in 2013 and more-recent moves to put caps on upfront commissions paid by product providers.

    The report also states that India’s ‘Fee and Expenses’ grade is below average. “It reflects some of the highest expense ratios for equity funds in the study and the reliance of ongoing trailing commissions to pay for advice”, the report said.

     

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    2 Comments
    Prashant · 6 years ago `
    Hello.......this is bull**** because nothing of what is mentioned is because of any regulations or investor maturity or investor behaviour. It is purely because of distributors efforts and hard work. And if we get paid for it what is wtong in it. Hiw much salary does an employee of AMC get ehether he works or he does not work? Whereas we have to keep working to earn our livelihood. If fund maanager does not deliver, he will still gets his fund management fees why? Wgy do you allow so many fund houses if they are not delivering? Why question is not asked by SEBI to a fund manager if he does not deliver? You say we have to only get fees and show our value addition. Why fund manager gets his fees even if he does not deliver or value add? Put a cap on salaries of all the employees of fund houses as you capped our commissions. Why double standards when it is between us and employees. Also when a company gets delisted or SEBI stops trading what happens to inveators? SEBI is not responsible for them? JP MORGAN passed on the loss to investors and SEBI was a silent spectator and allowed it. No matter if a listed compaby or mutual fund cheats the investors by misreporting or false reporting by companies and fund houses bringing in so many closed ended funds(SEBI allowing them to sell those) but only we distributors are held responsible for it and penalised by putting commission cap(even when there was 2% upfront commissions inveators have created wealth so it does not depend on commissions at all) and commission disclosure and now this foolish RIA regulation, why? Now it is time to ask whether fund houses and companies are bribing SEBI officials?
    MANINDER CHADHA · 6 years ago `
    stop biased report . As per study conducted by FIFA we have one of the lowest equity expense ratio. So dont publish such rubbish reports.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.