SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Now you can only be RIA or a distributor: SEBI

    Now you can only be RIA or a distributor: SEBI

    Existing registered investment advisers who are offering distribution services through immediate relatives or through separate division will have to choose between providing investment advice or distribution.
    Padmaja Choudhury Jan 2, 2018

    SEBI has floated another consultation paper to decide on ‘fee vs commission’ issue.

    The market regulator said that there should be segregation between investment advice and distribution of investment products. It also mentioned that mutual fund distributors could explain the features of the products and ensure that the product is suitable for the client.

    It further stated that the existing registered  investment  advisers  who  are  offering  distribution services  through  immediate  relatives  or  through  separate division will have to choose between providing  investment advice or  distribution before  March  31,  2019.

    In the earlier consultation paper, it had stated, “The investment adviser shall maintain arms-length  relationship between  its activities as investment adviser and distribution or execution services.”  

    The consultation paper has been revised based on the feedback received and to prevent the conflict of interest between advising of investment products and selling of  investment  products  by  the  same entity or person.  

    Considering the same, SEBI Board has sought public comments on following proposals:

    1. There should be clear segregation between the two activities of the entity i.e. providing  investment  advice  and  distribution  of  the  investment products/ execution of investment transactions.
    2. Individuals  who  are  willing  to  get  registered  as  investment  advisers  shall not provide  any distribution  services in  financial  products, either directly or   through   any   of   their   immediate   relatives. Similarly,   individuals providing  distribution  services  shall  not  provide  advice  for  investing  in financial  product  either  directly  or  through  their  immediate  relatives. “Immediate relative” means a spouse of a person, and includes  parent, brother, sister or child of such person or of the spouse as defined under SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover) Regulations, 2011.
    3. Banks, NBFCs, Body Corporates, LLPs and firms  who are willing to  get registered  as  investment  advisers,  shall  not  provide  any  distribution services  in  financial  products,  either  directly  or  through  their  holding company  or  associate  company  or  subsidiary  company.  Similarly, banks, NBFCs, body corporates, LLPs and firms providing distribution services shall not provide investment advice in financial products either directly or through their  holding  company  or  Associates  Company  or  subsidiary company. “Associate company” of an entity means a body corporate in which  the  entity or  its  director  or  partner  holds,  either  individually    or  collectively,    more    than    fifteen    percent   of    its   paid-up    equity    share capital or partnership interest, as the case may be.
    4. Existing  registered  investment  advisers  who  are  offering  distribution services  through  immediate  relatives  or  through separately  identifiable division or department   or   through   holding/subsidiary/associate company   shall   choose   among   providing   investment advice   or   the distribution  services  before  March  31,  2019.  Similarly,  distributors  who are  offering  advisory  services  through  aforesaid  modes  shall  also  choose between distribution services and advisory services. From April 01, 2019, any person, including their immediate relatives or holding/subsidiary/associate entity, shall offer either investment advice or distribution services.
    5. Mutual  Fund  Distributors  (MFDs),  while  distributing  their  mutual  fund products  can  explain  the  features  of  products  to  client,  and  shall  ensure the principle of ‘appropriateness’ of  products  to  the  client.  As  per  the extant  SEBI  circulars,  appropriateness  is  defined as  selling  only  that product  categorization  that  is  identified  as  best  suited  for  the  client.  As part of disclosures to clients, MFDs shall disclose the list of mutual funds they  are  affiliated  with  and  that  the  information  provided  is  restricted  to the mutual fund products being distributed by them. However, the client may  also  consider  other  alternate  products,  which are  not  being  offered by them before making investment decision.

    This will be the third consultation paper on RIA regulations. Earlier, SEBI had floated two-consultation papers on October 2016 and June 2017.

    You can email your feedback to sebiria@sebi.gov.in or send it by post to Deputy General Manager, Investment Management Department, SEBI, SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C4-A, G Block, BKC, Mumbai – 400051.

    Your comments should reach SEBI before January 23.

     

     

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    17 Comments
    Vishhal Malhotra · 6 years ago `
    I like it.
    AG · 6 years ago `
    This is interesting.

    I think many RIAs will be in trouble now because execution services either directly or thru immediate relatives is very easily identifiable and many RIAs will have to give up this practice where they earn thru execution and also try to earn thru advisory. I think some RIAs will choose to switch from advisory to execution if bulk of their revenue comes from execution and they use advisory primarily to bring in the new clients and to retain existing clients.

    As far as MFDs are concerned, they would be fine with all this - in fact happy. Not much would change for them. Any incidental advice that they give today in good faith and for the benefit of the client so that the client can decide upon the right set of funds to invest in will continue.

    Additional thoughts - Regulator is right when it talks about conflict of interest and such things. However, the regulator must also appreciate the ground level reality just a little more. RIAs or MFDs - they all get their initial clients from among their friends, relatives, colleagues, acquaintances. Subsequently, they start getting referals. So a big chunk of their initial client base come to them based on mutual trust. Competence is important but based on competence alone one can't get initial set of clients easily. Financial services market is highly competitive. So whoever enters this market, an RIA or an MFD, if he is an individual then he never thinks of breaking that trust between him and his initial set of clients. Even the referals he handles with care because referals are friends or relatives or colleagues of the first set of clients. And so on. So it's a very small world that individual RIAs n MFDs deal with - a world of known n known to known people, who are also their clients. New business doesn't fall from skies. One works hard to build it. Regulator should focus more on fixing the issues on Corporate Advisors and Corporate Distributors who give tough targets to their employees and many of those employees as relationship managers try to extract maximum business possible from the clients, many a times using not so fair practices.
    Shailesh Sampat · 6 years ago `
    Nice move but how MFD can ensure that perticular product is suitable for the clients. They can not evaluate the clients without having and data collection from the clie
    Viresh · 6 years ago `
    Awesome move. This clarity would help clear segregation for clients and also great for ONLY ADVICE advisors as well.
    I strongly feel, this should come thru in he interwst of Indv. Investor
    Viresh · 6 years ago `
    Awesome move. This clarity would help clear segregation for clients and also great for ONLY ADVICE advisors as well.
    I strongly feel, this should come thru in he interwst of Indv. Investor
    Shailesh Sampat · 6 years ago `
    ..data collection from the clients. If MFD is ensuring that the product is appropriate for the clients than 60% work is done. Ensuring the product product suitability is RIA's job. The matter should be cleared just like Doctor and Medical store. SEBI wants RIAs to work like Doctor then why the are not allowing MFDs to work like a medical store or a grocery store people will come and ask for the product.

    Now the paper is lookin somewhat balanced one but SEBI should ensure that the RIAs & MFDs jugal bundhi is not exist just like in medical field between doctor, medical store & pathological labs and if found tough steps should be taken on that matters.
    AG · 6 years ago
    On a lighter note - In India people are used to buying even prescription medicines over the counter if the problem is not too big for an experienced chemist to handle.
    Reply
    Alok Agrawal · 6 years ago `
    Let market dive 30%. All consultation paper will be gone.
    Rashmikant K Ashani · 6 years ago `
    What about distributors who are offering online advise and investment facilities?
    Vinod harjai · 6 years ago `
    What about Health or GI sold by MFD.
    As sebi & IRDA are different identity
    jaideep · 6 years ago `
    I see so many discussions on websites like valueresearch and FB and chat groups, where people request for and get recommendations, with no responsibility or accountability for the persons who give such advice, this is ridiculous. Finally, I still do not understand how this 'conflict of interest' is unique to the mutual fund industry, because I see it in every profession and business as a consumer.
    Gyan Prakash Sharma · 6 years ago `
    Get the advice from RIA and go direct to Mutual Fund House. What's the use of MFDs?
    RAHUL AGARWAL · 5 years ago
    If there are no distributors then in bad market conditions investors will loose faith as it is only because of them that the client holds on to his investment decision, every IRA needs a distributor. No research and strategy works in bad market conditions only client relation works, in an econmy like INDIA unlike the USA which we constantly try to copy people are sentimental and market is ineffecient ( a major factor for generating huge returns) advancement in technology will benefit the ones who are financially literate, kindly tell me the percentage of people who are financially literate, in an economy of 1.3 billion( approx.) we need both RIA's and
    Reply
    PRADIP PANDA · 6 years ago `
    SEBI is gunning after the MFDs & IRAs, citing conflict of Interest. I wonder what's stopping it from applying the same parameters for Stock Brokers. They provide both transaction & advisory services. And surprisingly SEBI is OK with this practice. SEBI is going after menows & letting the Sharks play around. Nearly 90% stock market retail players lose money- SEBI should be after the Stock Brokers-Not the MFDs-RIAs.
    RAHUL AGARWAL · 5 years ago
    Well said Sir !!
    Reply
    DHARAM PAL BANGAR · 6 years ago `
    It is a good initiative on behalf of the SEBI to separate advisory and distribution services for mutual funds but before doing so, SEBI should ban miss selling of mutual funds by banks and online advisory institutions.
    RAHUL AGARWAL · 5 years ago `
    In India the biggest mistake every investor makes is chasing these free services, why do you forget that in life there is no free lunch. You are paying 1% to a distributor but the effort he puts in just invaluable for the ones who are talking about misselling, let me remind you that in every community there are all sorts of people that does not that mean the whole community is bad. What we need is skilled RIA's who are allowed to use an ARN so that they provide the client both the options as per his needs and circumstances. Buying a movie ticket on an app and taking investment decisions through it is like comparing apples to oranges, it just does not make sense, the worst that will happen is that many investors will burn there hands in the market and learn the hard way.
    To sum it up you cant be an expert at everything, so either trust an expert or make sure that you turn out to be better than us.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.