SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Of every Rs.10 of retail AUM, Rs.9 is through distributors

    Of every Rs.10 of retail AUM, Rs.9 is through distributors

    AMFI data shows that 90% of retail AUM was in regular plans.
    Nishant Patnaik Jul 23, 2018

    Direct plans of mutual funds will take some time to gain momentum among retail investors. AMFI’s latest data shows that 90% of retail AUM was in regular plans of mutual funds as on June 2018.

    Surprisingly, a major portion of HNI AUM, who generally prefer going direct, have invested in mutual funds through regular plans. AMFI data shows that 81% of HNI assets were in regular plans of mutual funds. HNIs are investors who invest with a ticket size of Rs.5 lakh or above.

    A Balasubramanian, Chairman, AMFI and CEO, Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund believes that online distribution channel has contributed to the growth of regular plans. “A few investors who understand mutual funds invest through direct plans while most investors prefer investing through distributors who use technology. Today investors want to execute transaction and monitor their portfolio at a click of button and hence they prefer distributors who use technology. Also, distributors add a lot of value to clients by offering variety of services such as tax planning and estate planning.”

    Sunil Subramaniam, MD, Sundaram Mutual Fund believes retail investors prefer handholding by advisors to invest in mutual funds. He said, “Considering the volatile nature of equity investments, many investors prefer advisors to direct investing. There are 2000 odd schemes and investors want handholding of distributors to choose best schemes to achieve their financial gaols based on their risk appetite.”

    Another reason could be trust factor. Ajit Menon, DHFL Pramerica, believes that many investors in mutual funds have come through referrals. “In my view, many investors approach distributors through referrals. Hence, there is an element of trust. People like to work with someone they trust. Also, mutual fund investment requires a lot of logistic and administration support such as KYC, nomination, FATCA and so on, which investors cannot do on their own.”

    Menon further said, “At times, even if an investor decides to go direct, he would eventually come to distributors as they adds value through their services. Even today, many distributors offer products such as PPF and post office savings just to service their customers. This cannot happen in direct route.”

    In fact, a Foundation of Independent Financial Advisors (FIFA) and Final Mile study found that direct plan investors eventually come back to their advisors once they encounter complexities in mutual fund investments. The study said distributors need not panic if the customer opts for the direct option; while experiencing the inevitable difficulty in choosing mutual funds and performing transactions the customer is likely to return. “When customers evaluate the ‘sticker shock’ in the context of investment decision-making, they are more likely to stick with the advisor,” the study said.

    In percentage terms, 10% of retail assets and 19% of HNIs assets were in direct plans of mutual funds as on June 2018.

    The AMFI data also gives a break-up of the AUM under regular and direct plans in various schemes. It showed that regular plans are most preferred for investing in equity-oriented schemes. Nearly 84% of AUM in equity-oriented schemes came from distributors. Equity-oriented schemes include equity and balanced funds.

    However, this data includes individual and institutional investments in equity-oriented schemes. If we take the assets under individual investors, 92% of the individual AUM was under a regular plan.

    “The proportion of direct investments in equity, to the total assets held by individual investors, was about 8% in June 2018,” says AMFI. Individual investors include retail and HNIs.

    Among other categories of schemes, debt-oriented schemes also had a higher AUM under regular plans. Distributors managed 51% of the AUM of debt-oriented funds.

     

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    3 Comments
    amit · 5 years ago `
    I am looking at the above data from a different perspective as a fee-only financial planner. It took years for 100% and direct plans have already taken a market share of 10% in just 5 years. Great going. . .
    P Raghavan · 5 years ago `
    Investments in Mutual funds are not akin to investments in Fixed Deposits of Banks. The major difference is in terms of incentives paid to the mobilisers.An unwanted SC/ST/OBC type of Class conflict was created by the Regulating community by creating a NEW CLASS called "Direct". The Technology Savvy Community got an impression that they are paying an unwanted incentive to the Advisory community from the investment amount they are investing. Those investors were under the impression that they can get additional Units by saving these negligible commissions/incentives paid to the Advising Community. The experiments brought them to realise, after some time, that they were getting lesser "units" under the "direct" plans as compared to "Regular" plans. As far as redemptions are concerned, as long as the Email IDs are registered, the redemption process can be as easy as the "direct" plans, if one is Tech Savvy.

    Secondly, when MFs are NAV based the timing of investments are time controlled and it was always going to be difficult for an investor, to be sitting in front of a monitor to "time" the investment. This was the area under which the Advisors can score over "direct" as well as the Banking staff, who were luring the Investors to their side, only on the basis of the Bank Balance under their Control.

    Thirdly, the Time Managent and the performance analysis of Various investible Funds< the expertise needed, for Mutual Fund investments and personal time needed to solve the issues arising out of the "GENERATION GAPS" in the investment platforms also needed real Online Expertise in the field, other than just Tech Savviness.

    All these are relevant issues closer to the heart of the INVESTORS to desert the "Direct" Platform. Realisation of the wrong signals indicated by the Regulators.


    Raghavan


    Bikash · 5 years ago `
    If this is the case and the distributors are doing so good then why SEBI is killing us with curtailing in incentives and no AMCs standing for the distributors. We pay GST, we serve the clients, we take the pain to look for new investors, we do hand holding, we are responsible for the returns too but at the time of earning we get pea nuts. Neither the AMCs nor SEBI nor AMFI comes in to support us. Hard truth but reality of the industry. We are proud that we are distributors and are more dynamic then any other industry to adopt to changes.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.