SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • Guest Column Do mutual funds manage their NAV during year-end?

    Do mutual funds manage their NAV during year-end?

    Putting the NAV manipulation conspiracy theory under the microscope
    Vijay Mantri May 10, 2018

    Laced with intrigue, hinting at machinations conspiracies theories are irresistible. Their creditability particularly increases when the person propagating it is part of the system. One such theory floating in mutual fund industry since times immemorial talks about how mutual funds manipulate NAVs. We tend to hear this when markets rise in the month of March and more so if there is a sudden spike in markets in the last week of March.

    This year when the markets unexpectedly started rising in the beginning of last week of March the conspiracy theorists had a blast. However, the ensuing correction in market turned the entire theory upside down.

    In this article, using publicly available data I have tried to analyze whether the theory holds any merit.

    The below chart, analyses returns of last 18 financial years. The annual returns have been bifurcated as returns for the month of March and returns generated during the last week of the March each year.

    As explained in the above chart, there are eight potential scenarios.

    The below table assigns financial years to above-mentioned scenarios and examines if there was possible NAV manipulation.

    Various Scenarios

    Return for Financial Year

    Return for the month of March

    Return for the last week of March month

    Is NAV Manipulation possible

    Categorization of all the FY in various scenarios

    Scenario 1

    Positive

    Positive

    Positive

    No

    2005-06,2009-10, 2010-11,2013-14, 2016-17

    Scenario 2

    Positive

    Positive

    Negative

    No

    2006-07

    Scenario 3

    Positive

    Negative

    Positive

    May be

    2003-04, 2004-05, 2007-08, 2012-13

    Scenario 4

    Positive

    Negative

    Negative

    No

    1999-00, 2014-15, 2017-18

    Scenario 5

    Negative

    Positive

    Positive

    Likely

    2008-09, 2015-16

    Scenario 6

    Negative

    Positive

    Negative

    No

    None

    Scenario 7

    Negative

    Negative

    Positive

    Very Likely

    2011-12

    Scenario 8

    Negative

    Negative

    Negative

    No

    2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03

     

    Looking at the above table it is evident that NAV manipulation is possible when market rise in the last week of the March contrary to their performance during the month as well during the financial year. Carrying this assumption forward, I have calculated Nifty returns for the financial year,, for the month of March and for the last week of March.  The below table summarizes the results.

    I have highlighted in red the scenarios when returns in the last week of March deviate from the annual and/ or monthly returns.

    Financial Year

    Return for Financial Year

    Return for the month of March

    Return for the last week of March month

    Scenario

    1999-00

    41.78%

    -7.64%

    -2.62%

    Scenario 4

    2000-01

    -24.88%

    -15.04%

    -1.13%

    Scenario 8

    2001-02

    -1.62%

    -1.09%

    -0.78%

    Scenario 8

    2002-03

    -13.40%

    -8.01%

    -3.52%

    Scenario 8

    2003-04

    81.14%

    -1.58%

    4.72%

    Scenario 3

    2004-05

    14.89%

    -3.21%

    1.00%

    Scenario 3

    2005-06

    67.15%

    10.66%

    3.74%

    Scenario 1

    2006-07

    12.31%

    2.04%

    -1.02%

    Scenario 2

    2007-08

    23.89%

    -9.36%

    2.70%

    Scenario 3

    2008-09

    -36.19%

    9.31%

    2.80%

    Scenario 5

    2009-10

    73.76%

    6.64%

    0.46%

    Scenario 1

    2010-11

    11.14%

    9.38%

    5.64%

    Scenario 1

    2011-12

    -9.23%

    -1.66%

    0.33%

    Scenario 7

    2012-13

    7.31%

    -0.18%

    0.86%

    Scenario 3

    2013-14

    17.98%

    6.81%

    1.83%

    Scenario 1

    2014-15

    26.65%

    -4.62%

    -0.61%

    Scenario 4

    2015-16

    -8.86%

    10.75%

    0.28%

    Scenario 5

    2016-17

    18.55%

    3.31%

    0.72%

    Scenario 1

    2017-18

    10.25%

    -3.61%

    -0.01%

    Scenario 4

    Thus, extrapolating from the above data we realize that holdings during years 2003-4, 2004-5, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2011-12, 2012-13 and year 2015-16 need to be examined to understand if there was any manipulation. In case funds are, purchasing stocks in the last month and week of the year to shore up prices it should be visible in their cash holdings. Let us look at cash holdings at the end of February and March in each of these years. If funds are buying more equity in last month and week of the market then naturally their cash holdings should decline in the March as compared with February end cash holding.

    Examining the cash holdings in February and March from  the financial year 2003-04  we realize that that except for the year 2008-09, 2009-10, 2012-13, 2014-15 and 2015-16 every year cash holding at the end of March was higher than cash holding in February end.

    Financial Year

    Cash holdings in MF scheme (Rs. Crores)

    Feb end

    Mar end

    2003-04

    559

    650

    2004-05

     262

     362

    2005-06

    746

    797

    2006-07

    2,063

    2,166

    2007-08

    2,474

    3,145

    2008-09

    3,945

    3,656

    2009-10

    2,631

    2,372

    2010-11

    1,263

    2,646

    2011-12

    878

    870

    2012-13

    1,748

    1,604

    2013-14

    1,650

    2,111

    2014-15

    3,546

     3,300

    2015-16

    3,397

    3,162

    2016-17

    5,992

    6,157

    2017-18

    12,216

     

    Even in years when cash holding at March end fell below February end cash holding, the difference is too miniscule for it to have any meaningful impact.

    The conclusion

    Mutual funds have seen astronomical cash flow in the last two years. However, during both these years, the performance in March was below the annual performance and the cash holdings in March were lower than the February end cash position in schemes.

    Thus, based on the factual data, I am of the opinion that mutual funds do not resort to NAV management.

    Vijay Mantri is Co-Promoter and Chief Mentor of Buckfast Financial Advisory Services. He was former CEO of Pramerica MF and Deutsche MF. He had also worked with HDFC MF and Aditya Birla Group.

    The views expressed in this article are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cafemutual.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    0 Comment
    Be the first to comment.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.