SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News 43% of direct plans and 67% of regular plan underperformed in 3 years: SEBI WTM

    43% of direct plans and 67% of regular plan underperformed in 3 years: SEBI WTM

    49% of the total AUM under regular plan equity funds underperformed in 3 years.
    Nishant Patnaik Jun 12, 2025

    Listen to this article

    At the Cafemutual Passives Conference 2025, SEBI WTM Amarjeet Singh revealed that 43% of direct plan equity schemes underperformed their respective benchmarks in the three years period ending February 2025. In terms of AUM, 29% of the AUM under direct plan equity funds underperformed during this period, he added.

    Such underperformance was more prevalent in regular plans, with 67% of the total schemes—comprising 49% of the total AUM under equity funds—having underperformed their respective indices in the 3-year period ending February 2025, he added.

    Singh said regular plans have a higher component of charges and fees, so underperformance becomes even sharper.

    While the premise of active is attractive, and there are funds which outperform their respective benchmarks handsomely, data shows that it is a challenge to find such funds before they outperform, Singh added.

    On the other hand, passive funds go by EMH, i.e., Efficient Market Hypothesis, which means the market reflects all known information to discover a price and hence, it becomes difficult to beat the market on a consistent basis, he added.

    Singh said, research carried out in the US by Dr. Sir Francis Galton, in which he ran a competition where people were asked to guess the weight of an ox in 1906, illustrates this. Surprisingly, while no one guessed the weight of the ox correctly, the median weight guess of 787 people was nearly spot on. Markets, in many ways, reflect the so-called wisdom of collective intelligence, he added.

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    9
    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    7 Comments
    Anup Agarwal · 1 week ago `
    Dear Sir,

    There is no correlation of the fee charged to a scheme with the under performance of the scheme. Nobody underperforms by 50 or 100 bps just becoz of charges.

    The real culprit is the strategy and over confidence of the fund management team and they do not review their decisions and processes.

    It is our (MFD & other intermediary's) duty to study funds before giving it to client on various parameters.

    Unfortunately everybody is busy in SELLING mutual funds and not GIVING SOLUTIONS to clients.

    Rgds,
    Mohinder Singh Kamboj · 1 week ago
    True.
    Reply
    The Invest Quotient Financial Services · 1 week ago `
    Whenever a point-to-point comparison is made one should be cognizant of the periods considered. The three-year criteria it is a very short time for such Comparisions. Besides all those heavy weights in the indices probably never became a part of actively managed funds due to some reasons. Again, we are talking of Feb 25 the markets bottoming end Feb. Many such points would come out. Only thing is one shouldn't be showing the other in bad light to prove one's superiority. Someday your turn will come, it could be just round the corner. Not all that are shown are shining bright, there are the cloudy days too for these people too. Besides there will be the dark horses in these stables too...!!!
    Pankaj Thakare · 1 week ago `
    While the data point is noted, it’s important to highlight that drawing conclusions based on a limited 3-year period may not provide a fair assessment of fund performance. Markets have gone through significant short-term volatility in recent years, which can temporarily skew such statistics. A more robust evaluation would involve analyzing performance across full market cycles (5, 7, or 10 years), considering risk-adjusted returns, category benchmarks, and consistency of fund management. Without this broader context, such figures may lead to incomplete or even misleading conclusions.
    Mithilesh · 1 week ago `
    I disagree. I think that the concerned person does not have faith in equity market. I am sure he must not be having his own investment in equity. I have come across many people in last 25 years who say most negative things to others despite the fact that they do not have their own investment or they just withdraw money when the market was down against the advice of the MFD. I have been catering to about 200 customers regularly and none of them is at a loss in 3 years time. A few schemes are underperforming but on the whole the portfolios are giving handsome return and the customers are happy. I am sure most MFDs must be having the same experience. Such negative comments from a person who is representing SEBI is uncalled for. Their job is to regulate market well so that people have confidence in the market.
    Jaideep Shirali · 1 week ago `
    One aspect that SEBI has to explain is how the difference between Regular and Direct expenses is, in many cases, much more than the brokerage paid to distributors, though investors essentially save on brokerage when opting for Direct plans, this anomaly increases the difference between direct and regular plans. Secondly, 3 years for equity schemes is not the correct indicator, because longer periods such as 5 years are recommended for equity funds.
    Amit Gulati · 1 week ago `
    As we see the complexity of investment and wealth creation increasing day by day necessitating the need for more mutual fund distributors and advisors industry seems to be still interested in promoting the direct plans. Promoting the direct plans is akin to promoting the chemist and ignoring the doctors.
    Investors today have mammoth goals to achieve running in crores of rupees and then they are advised to go direct and save the commissions. Nothing is being done to regulate the junk advices being peddled on social media and youtube. Lakhs of investors are losing money in stock market because social media tell them its very easy to make quick money. No study is done to critically analyze the pitfalls of direct plans.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.