SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News SEBI nudges fund houses to reduce costs

    SEBI nudges fund houses to reduce costs

    The regulator believes that the costs of Indian mutual funds are higher than those in other countries.
    Nishant Patnaik Jun 4, 2016

    SEBI is said to have nudged fund houses to reduce TER to expand the reach of mutual funds, said three people familiar with the development.

    SEBI has reportedly communicated this message to fund houses through AMFI in a recent meeting.

    “SEBI wants us to reduce TER. The regulator feels that the cost structure of Indian mutual funds is very high compared to other countries,” said one of senior officials on the condition of anonymity.

    A few months back, C VR Rajendran, CEO, AMFI had said that SEBI wants to cap the TER at 2%. He was speaking at the Cafemutual IFA Event 2016 held in February. He said, “Globally, costs are coming down. If TER comes down, naturally, fund houses cannot pay the commission they are paying today. IFAs cannot increase their revenues by expecting higher commissions.”

    SEBI Chief U K Sinha has reiterated that AMCs should reduce costs in order to expand the reach of mutual funds. “In asset management in India, the cost is quite high. We are one of the six countries where it is more than 2%. If we really want to expand the reach of mutual funds, then this has to be reduced,” he was quoted in Value Research Mutual Fund Insights.

    The Sumit Bose committee has also recommended that the TER charged by AMCs should come down. “Competition has not reduced costs much below the expense ratio that was fixed when the AUM of the industry was much lower,” states the Sumit Bose committee report.

    “Managing cost is always a challenge. The mutual fund industry should come out with a solution to rationalize costs before intervention of the Finance Ministry,” SEBI Chairman U K Sinha is reported to have told members in the recent AMFI AGM.

    The regulator has already started working in this direction. It has formed a committee headed by Nandan Nilekani, former Chairman of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and co-founder of Infosys which has been tasked to suggest measures to reduce cost in mutual funds.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    10 Comments
    Renu · 8 years ago `
    Mearge all similar fund to reduce cost. Fund should be of 5 category
    Large cap.
    Small n mid cap.
    Multicap.
    Tax fund.
    Balance fund.

    Debt.
    Only two
    Short term
    Long term..

    Liquid only one
    Luquid fund.

    2.
    All hav with similar name no confusion.

    Like
    Reliance large cap
    Hdfc large cap
    Icici large cap.

    No other name of fund.
    Fund name itself show its nature.

    Not like gol- mol
    Reliance regular saving fund
    Icici dynamic ....

    3.
    Reduce trail 0.5 and applicable for all AMC only one trail.

    Differance in trail attract distributor towards it beside better fund.

    4.
    Remove direct option as this option demorlise distributors
    If no broker code it should be of amfi code and commission goes for mf advertisement.

    5.
    Make existing fund of lock in period 3-5-10 yrs.
    Only For new cadre individual ARN and pay him all trait as upfront upto 5 cr AUM reached.

    Also relax small fund house to make lock in preiod upto 10 yrs in exisiting fund only no need to launch NFO.
    And pay trail as upfront till their AUM reach 50,000 cr .

    There should not be any upfront commission for all only trail 0.5 to reduce expance ratio.

    This will reduce launch of unnecessary NFO.

    Try to keep expance ratio within 1.5% for all equity.

    Apply this model if want to run mf with true sprit.
    l.ashok · 8 years ago
    Your suggestion is really good. Also they should withdraw the service tax, as your suggestion, we are going to get only meagre trail and the Govt. is not charging the service tax to other financial instruments, like insurance, FD,postal deposits,etc.
    Nishant · 8 years ago
    Gr8 recommendations
    Arun · 8 years ago
    suggestions are good except all plans should have except Direct option. If there is no direct option and no distributor code the commission should be used for IFA's distributors NISM and AMFI registration / CPE fees collected as Jizia tax.
    Reply
    Nikhil Khatiwala · 8 years ago `
    Ms..Renu's suggestions are excellent. It will create Win Win situations for everyone. The MF industry will grow many folds. Investors will get unbaised advice and only true advisor will be in the business.
    Ajeet Srivastava · 8 years ago `
    Foreign/inland Trips Freebees should stopped.Operational Cost of AMC
    Should be capped lower .To reduce cost of investments.
    Arvind Thakur · 8 years ago `
    Renu you Should be in AMFI and SEBI Board, if you stick to your words, not like UK Sinha, who advocate distributor interest before joining SEBI chair, but after his words and mind goes completely change like our politician.
    Pawan khurana · 8 years ago `
    Suprise & contradictory decision of SEBI & AMFI. While justifying the cost & expenses in mutual fund , Comparing with the other countries & justifying the expenses.
    BUT
    on the other hand DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION , SEBI never give the example of other countries .
    SEBI taken the DISPUTED DECISION.

    Bala · 8 years ago `
    The regulator is really going more and more looney day by day. Their frustration levels are really increasing - I think instead of thinking of these ideas of reducing costs in such absurd manners, the regulator needs to pull up its socks first and do something that will help the industry grow and actually prosper - not struggle to survive.
    S J KHAN · 8 years ago `
    Sir I am also agree with you.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.