SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • News From Press Mutual Fund expense ratios will come down due to regulations, competition, or investor needs: Sundeep Sikka of Nippon MF

    Mutual Fund expense ratios will come down due to regulations, competition, or investor needs: Sundeep Sikka of Nippon MF

    Source: The Hindu Businessline Sep 13, 2022

    Passive no longer means inactive, at least in stock market parlance! Passive investing in mutual funds has caught on in a big way and passive assets under management (AAUMs) now constitute about ₹4.8 lakh crore, or 13 per cent of the total industry pie today. Nippon India Mutual Fund is among the leading players in this category with over three dozen schemes, managing about ₹62,000 crore.

    Click here to read

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    2 Comments
    Prashant Shah · 2 years ago `
    As long as the regulator conjucts with AMCs to help maximise their profits ot will only and only be regulation only. Competition is not possible as they already have a lobby(cartel) in place from a long time which is acknowledged by the government and the regulator who gives them power to issue so called best practices and charge fees to distributors for ARN and reduce their commissions especially when the regulator brings regulation to decrease TER. THE ENTIRE DECREASE IN TER IS PASSWD ONTO THE DISTRIBUTOR(WHICH THE REGULATOR AND GOVERNMENT KNOWS BUT ARE SILENT). Investor needs is never taken into account as in case of direct plans what happened is the investor invested to save cost but are clueless on where to invest so Google university flourished and most of them either lost or gained hardly. Also Franklin incident was the biggest example of how much investor is given importance by regulator or government. In fact yes bank, PMC bank, ILFS and so many more example shows that they ate not bothered about investors or depositors at all. All regulators are working to benefit and promote the very industry and companies they are supposed to regulate.

    It's a shame
    Prashant Shah · 2 years ago
    And If cost is the only thing regulator regulates than how and why are AMCs increasing TERs in each and every scheme whether direct or regular and the regulator is silent on it?
    Reply
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.