Insurance High first year commission has no relation with persistency ratio: IRDAI

High first year commission has no relation with persistency ratio: IRDAI

Nilesh Sathe, Member (Life), IRDAI asserted that many agents end up getting only 10% of total premium as first year commission instead of 35%.
Rosevina Gonsalves and Nishant Patnaik Sep 4, 2017

Contrary to recommendations of various committees on rationalization of upfront commission structure of insurance agents to increase the persistency ratio, Nilesh Sathe, Member (Life), IRDAI has asserted that high first year commission has no relation with the renewal rate.

He was speaking at an insurance event held recently in Mumbai.

Sathe said that the IRDAI has found that Indian life insurers do not pay adequate commissions to their agents.

He further said that only a few agents get the entire 35% of the premium amount as the first year commission. Many agents end up getting only 10% of annual premium as the first year commission. In practice, they do not churn policies due to unattractive incentives, said Sathe.

A recent RBI committee report has recommended IRDAI uniformity between the first year commission (upfront) and renewal commission (trail) to improve the persistency ratio. IRDAI data shows that the 13th month persistency ratio for the life insurance industry was at 61% in 2016. It reduces to just 28% in the fifth year. This indicates that almost 72% of life insurance policies do not last for five years.

In its recommendation, the committee said, “The current distribution incentives in the industry provide for high commissions for agents for initial product sales, but subsequently far lower commissions allowed for renewals of pre-existing policies. This set of financial incentives appears misaligned in the direction of skewing household outcomes towards initial take up of policies, and subsequent lapsation.”

Another popular myth associated with insurance business is that insurance companies benefit from lapsation of insurance policies, said Sathe. “Lapsation of a policy does not benefit anyone. How could be it benefit them if insurance companies do not receive premium and agents stop getting renewal commission. IRDAI norms do not allow insurance companies to transfer the premium of lapsed policies to shareholders funds. It remains in the life insurance fund and distributed amongst those who regularly pay their premiums.”

On digitalization and e-commerce distribution of insurance, Sathe said that technology can never replace brick and mortar distribution channel. He said that agents are the backbone of the industry and nothing can replace them.

He said, “Four out of ten policyholders do research online but buy policies from their financial advisors. Though technology will help strengthen insurance distribution and increase penetration, people require handholding of advisors to make investment decisions,” he added.

Prashant · 9 months ago
I really appreciate this speech as he understood our irony and our problems. @10% commissions on premiums meaning we have to keep working every month which, due to bombarding of wrong knowledge and data by media, is becoming extremely difficult. Term is one solution of all the problems is absolutely wrong. They do not consider 2 things. Comfort and whether everyone will get term insurance or not.

Absolutely foolish or malafide on media to propogate for the benefit of the compabies at the cist of customers.
Nagaraja K · 9 months ago
What is persistency? The two things which are important are Premium and Number of Policies. The churning of policies is an age old practice. It will go on.
Wish to stay on top of your game? Get daily tips, ideas and articles to grow your business.
Subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter.