SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • Guest Column Is buy & hold strategy a ‘Bramhastra’ in investment world?

    Is buy & hold strategy a ‘Bramhastra’ in investment world?

    Investment is not complete without disinvestment.
    Vijai Mantri Oct 13, 2021

    According to Indian mythology, Bramhastra never fails. It is a sure shot way to win a battle.

    In investment parlance, most experts swear by buy and hold strategy and strongly believe that it will never fail. 

    I am also a big fan of buy and hold strategy. But deep-dive research done by our team shows us a very different picture. Buy and hold does work and continues to remain one of the best strategies in wealth creation but with a caveat! Like most important question of life, even the answer to this question is both ‘Yes’ and ‘No’.

    Buy and hold still remains the best strategy if you do not have any cash flow requirement. But if you have to take out even a small portion of money because of some emergency then buy and hold may not work. Remember, investment is not complete without disinvestment. Basically, investment is just one leg to a transaction and unless it is disinvested the second leg of transaction is not completed.

    How has buy and hold fared in a situation where investors needed for example regular income post-retirement? 

    Here are the assumptions:

    1. Investors start with a capital of say Rs. 1 crore
    2. The entire Rs. 1 crore is in equity as on April 1 of any financial year
    3. Investors take out 8% of this corpus (Rs.1 cr X 8%= Rs.8 lakh) to meet their expenses in monthly instalment of Rs.66667/- (Rs. 8,00,000/12)
    4. The monthly withdrawals increases by 6% per annum to account for rise in inflation
    5. The start date is April 1 and starting year was 1980 and then investor could have started in any year from 1980 till 2020

    6. Results are on BSE Sensex without considering the dividend yields

    Here are the results of our research:

    Investors created huge wealth and were also able to fund their retirement needs for minimum of 20 years post their start period. These years can be termed as great years. If investors started in any of the following years, then the results are very satisfactory:

    From 1980 to 1991                                            = 12 years

    From 2001 till 2005                                           = 5 years

    From 2012 till 2020                                           = 9 years

    Years with satisfactory results    = 26 Years

    Challenging Years

    Start Year                                             Corpus got over by

    1992                                         Oct 2009 (in 17 years) 

                1993                                         Feb 2007 (in 14 years)

                1994                                         Dec 2002 (in 8 years)

                1995                                         July 2005 (10 years)

                1996                                         Jan 2008 (12 years)

                1997                                         Jan 2011 (14 years)

                1998                                         Feb 2011 (13 years)

                1999                                         Sept 2016 (17 years)

                2000                                         Feb 2013 (13 years)

                2006                                         May 2020 (14 years)

                2007                                         Jun 2020 (13 years)

                2008                                         Feb 2020 (12 years)

                2010                                         Rs.34 Lakh left

                2011                                         Rs. 50 lakh left

    Years with challenging performance are 14 in total. So out of 40 years, 14 years i.e. 35% of times, the performance of the portfolio remained challenging. 

    So, buy and hold does work in majority of times but past data shows that it does not work 1/3rd of the time. 

    In short, even if an investor needs a small portion from his invested amount, there is 35% chance that he will run out of money. 

    Why does this happen. It is just the reverse of SIP. SIP does extremely well when market is in bear phase. On the contrary, if someone does SWP during bear phase then more units are redeemed.

    In a way, market timing does matter but no one get the market timing right consistently. 

    To overcome this, investors should have a good financial advisor on their side to create strategies or follow asset allocation model. 

    Vijai Mantri is Chief Investment Strategist and Co-Promoter, JRL Money. The views expressed in this article are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cafemutual.

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    1 Comment
    Paresh A Shah · 2 years ago `
    yes absolute right he had told and also explain in around 2003-2004
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.