SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News FIFA to approach SEBI on upfront commission ban

    FIFA to approach SEBI on upfront commission ban

    FIFA Chairman, Dhruv Mehta said that they would request SEBI to reconsider its decision on banning upfront commission.
    Team Cafemutual Sep 19, 2018

    The Foundation of Independent Financial Advisor (FIFA) will soon approach SEBI requesting them to reconsider its decision on banning upfront commission and reducing TER.

    FIFA Chairman, Dhruv Mehta told Cafemutual that they would approach SEBI on the issue of upfront commission and TER reduction. He said, “The federation believes that the move will challenge the existence of small IFAs. Currently, close to 30,000 IFAs manage AUM of less than Rs.1 crore. These IFAs are hardly earning Rs.10,000 to Rs.15,000 per month. A hit of 20% on their earnings is a big blow to them.”

    Mehta further said that the move would also affect retail investors. “In my view, the cost of servicing retail investors has now gone up. It is not viable for many distributors to service investors investing up to Rs.10 lakh as distributors end up spending more money to acquire such clients.”

    In a letter sent to SEBI before its board meeting, FIFA had said that reduction in TER could affect earnings of IFAs. The federation had said, “Many small investors have just started investing in mutual funds over the last couple of years. If you reduce expense ratio, that would mean a reduction in earnings for IFAs. This in turn will harm small investors as the earnings out of their investments will make it unviable for IFAs to service and handhold them.”

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    45 Comments
    rajeev gupta · 5 years ago `
    How come petrol diesel cost sky rocketing more than 20% in a year ,rupee depreciating 14% in a year an cost of servicing investor can be brought down drastically by over 20%?IT SEEMS PEOPLE SITTING AT TOP are not aware of logistics and day to day servicing of various kind of investors.There is already hit of
    GST ALREADY cost of mutual fund was already low compared to so many countries?Ask government to reduce plethora of taxes before reducing income which is right step not the other way. There are not enough jobs & if one goes for self employed way you create hurdles by way of regulatory interference and taxes.what you want society to become society of budding entrepreneurs or gang of chain snatchers?
    Divyeshbhai J Makani · 5 years ago
    Very true Rajeevbhai it's very poor decision and I feel most of IFA has accepted I don't understand why? It might be due there is no voice IFA Now what will happen will happen - most of small IFA compulsory have to change the focus for other financial product and apart from that small new investor coming to market may not served by Small IFA How penetration will increase now with the help of New few online RIA platform banks and Nds? Is this model authority wants in india to survive???
    Ajay Chacko · 5 years ago
    Thats a very valid point that Mr. Rajeev Gupta has made with regard to the Self employment opportunities. When the nation is facing such a huge challenge in employing its ever-burgeoning workforce, it should work towards creating opportunities rather than putting roadblocks for entrepreneurship.
    This certainly is a big thumbs down on many counts apart from the above. Most of the investing fraternity requires hand-holding and IFAs are best-suited for this responsibility. By taking these drastic measures you are trying to cut down and choke up the IFA channel.
    I only hope there is a reversal or atleast the AMCs should absorb the costs to the maximum possible extent.
    SANJAY BARAD · 5 years ago
    We all are strongly opose tha same and try stop to work one or more day to attand sebi
    Reply
    vikas Gupta · 5 years ago `
    Welcome step by FIFA.
    Uttam kumar · 5 years ago
    This is really bad
    Reply
    Sadhna Sachdeva · 5 years ago `
    For the kind attention on behalf I FAs I think the SEBI is in so hurry to do away with the upfront but they do not understand the nerve of IFAs that
    V Sreenivas Murthy · 5 years ago `
    Very Good decision. Don't think of just city people. Think of 3rd tier cities and towns. SEBI has think high level decision. Even in my side, many of small investors not awareness about Mutual funds. They need help at 2 or more sittings. if we avoid, we loss much. So, approach SEBI and explain all these........
    Ganesh · 5 years ago `
    Welcome step by FIFA
    Vasanthraju T · 5 years ago `
    Very Good move from FIFA
    Ashish Kumar vyas · 5 years ago `
    Hallo,
    Very true..
    SEBI ?? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ?? advisor ?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??..
    Advisor ????? ?? ?? ??? Fund ?? ????? ???? ?? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ??
    Insurance company ?? ULIP PLAN.. ?? ????? ???? commission ???? ?????? ???? ????..
    Insurance company ?? traditional plan ka commission ?????? ???? ????..
    Insurance company me return ?? client ko ?????? ???? ?????..
    Post office ?? ??? ???? ???? Advisor ?? ?? ?????? commission ????? ??


    Insurance company ?? advisor ?? post office ?? ??? ???? ???? advisor ?? commision ?? compare ???? ??? ?? mutual fund ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??????..

    Mutual funds ?? advisior ????? update ???? ?? ???? ???? update knowlege ?? ????? ???? ??...


    ??? ???? ???? point ?? ??? ?? baat ?? ?? ???? ??...
    Bharat ??? ??? ??? ?? ????????? ??? ??? ??..
    ???? ?? ????????? ???...
    ??? ??? ?? ????? ??? ??? ??... Inflation ?? bit ???? ???? product kon...

    ???? ???? baate hai....


    SEBI ?? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???.... ??? ???? ??
    inderjeet Singh · 5 years ago `
    Amazon have started selling insurance and soon will be launching platform for mutual funds.......just try to understand the intention.... remove the small IFAs and promote multinational companies.
    Wow SEBI......!

    Neeraj Tiwari · 5 years ago `
    SEBI want to remove IFA and promote multinational companies.
    Suresh udeshi · 5 years ago `
    Good move by FiFa
    Gaurav Sharma · 5 years ago `
    A welcome move from FIFA. SEBI should reconsider their decision.
    Nilesh · 5 years ago `
    All the action of sebi is against the ifa. It’s shows that they want to remove ifa from system step by step. They should also put eyes on fund managers performance also. Why the nav of funds go below theRs 10 . It’s also a huge loss for investors who just put money in nfo. If sebi really wants to save investor wealth than they should bound mf companies that the nav of nfo should not go beyond Rs 10.
    mahesh kumar sahoo · 5 years ago `
    are sabhi upper bala gandimara Apna benifit dekhtehain who care ifa maghia male
    sanjay sonawane · 5 years ago `
    its all favoring in paytm et mony and policybazar
    George Samuel · 5 years ago `
    FIFA should keep knocking to drive home our genuine cause. Besides, Life Insurance Companies are now trying to come together to obtain a separate tax treatment for "investment" in life insurance policies as "they are long term investment." I am sure they will get away with it. What a paradox ! And, we claim to be the best and the largest democracy.
    Gaurav jain · 5 years ago `
    You all are blaming to SEBI,other side AMCs plan is going to success.
    Kundan kumar · 5 years ago `
    How can they promote or or sell such risky mutual funds, online or direct without advice of advisor, who is advising such things to sebi, they are increasing their TA,DA etc.and decreasing our comission with this inflation..OMG ..we should unite and take action against it, its better to fight than starvation..
    Sanjay kumar jha · 5 years ago `
    Good step taken by FIFA. Rajeev Gupta is saying 100%correct. SEBI wants how kick out IFA from this business
    abhijit a phadke · 5 years ago
    How can sebi do this? is it want to increase unemployment? If the IFA not earn enough then why will do the job of IFA - it means increase unemployment! I also oppose to give mutual platform for amazon, paytm etc. & also direct plans........
    Reply
    Viral vyas · 5 years ago `
    It is very valid point from FIFA Chairman sir.
    That cost of servicing customer gone up due raise in other cost like petrol,rent etc.

    SEBI must not only think in one direction but also look on the both side of coin. And it not that only MUTUAL FUND ADVSIORS are only charging them. When investor do other investment there is high other cost involved. Why SEBI is not taking it into account.
    Mithilesh Kumar Singh · 5 years ago `
    A totally unwarranted move without considering the growth & development of the country. Many of us earn our living from it. It will reduce not only our income but also the national income. On the other hand unfair practices like allowing banks to complete with us are not taken care of. Banks take undue advantage of their access to accounts of their clients
    Prakash godbole · 5 years ago `
    After read various comments on sebi for reducing ifa's upfront commission but one should consider that about 5to 10Years back IFA used to push mutual fund investment to customers with high NFO upfront commissions to earn but now IFA should understand that invester themselves are coming forward and calling ifa's. to do investment through advisors and while market size is increasing order your earning automatically grows up whether small ifa's or big advisor and mind well it is only unique financial product which has trail commission other than any other financial product so in my opinion sebi has a right move to reduce overhead charges to attract new investers
    Sudhir Kumar Mishra · 5 years ago `
    I do agree with you and support your move to discuss about this.we meet clients regularly and informed and educate,in return agreed to subscribe a scheme.
    Chetan sankhla · 5 years ago `
    A welcome dicission of FIFA. One more mejor issue is we are adding fresh new investors into industry and after few when investor watching advertisement about direct funds investors move to direct plans. Distributors are delivering efforts for customer awareness about mutual fund and help customers for first time on boarding and some time distributors loosing their clients. Sebi must introduce a rule that if any investor did his/her first Investment in regular then he/her can't Investment in direct plan. Direct plan must be available only for those investor who did his first Investment also in direct plan.
    Today it's very common that investors asking from distributor about best suitable mutual fund for his/her and investing in direct plan.
    Sumit · 5 years ago `
    Now many IFA shift their investor investment to ulips , this will surely leads to misselling and effect the mutual fund industry badly
    Sumit · 5 years ago `
    Now many IFA shift their investor investment to ulips , this will surely leads to misselling and effect the mutual fund industry badly
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.