SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Now, AMCs will have to disclose management fees along with your commission

    Now, AMCs will have to disclose management fees along with your commission

    SEBI has asked fund houses to disclose investment and advisory fees and other expenses along with the commission of distributors.
    Nishant Patnaik Oct 23, 2018

    In a bid to increase transparency in mutual funds, SEBI has asked fund houses to disclose investment and advisory fees and other expenses along with the gross commission of distributors with immediate effect.

    Simply put, the half yearly consolidated account statement (CAS) will now have two more columns for the disclosure of management fees and other expenses along with the gross commission paid to distributors. However, the market regulator has not clarified if such disclosures will be in percentage terms or absolute terms.

    Anuj Kumar, CEO, CAMS believes that fund houses will have to disclose such disclosures in percentage terms. “Since there is no mention on this it is better to disclose such expenses in percentage terms.”

    However, a few experts have a different view. “Since fund houses have been disclosing gross commission of distributors in absolute terms, they will have to disclose management fees and other expenses in absolute terms to maintain uniformity.”

    In a press release SEBI said, “The scheme’s average total expense ratio (in percentage terms) along with  the  break  up  between investment  and  advisory  fees,  commission  paid  to  the distributor and other  expenses  for  the  period  for  each  scheme’s  applicable plan  (regular  or  direct  or  both)  where  the  concerned  investor  has  actually  invested in.”

    This commission figure includes all direct monetary payments and other payments made in the form of gifts/rewards, trips, event sponsorships etc. by AMCs to distributors. Also, this disclosure come with a footnote that reads, “The commission in Col 9 above indicates gross commission received by the distributor against the respective investment and does not exclude costs incurred by distributors such as service tax (wherever applicable, as per existing rates), operating costs, etc.”

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    39 Comments
    Vikrant · 5 years ago `
    Sebi hai hai,jor SE bolo sebi hai hai.sab mil ker bolo sebi hai hai.
    CHANDOLU SRINIVAS · 5 years ago `
    WHEN MARKET IS DOING GOOD ADS ARE VIGOROUS MUTUAL FUNDS SAHI HAI AND WHERE ARE THESE ADS NOW IN THIS MARKET DOWN TREND ?
    CHANDOLU SRINIVAS · 5 years ago `
    PEOPLE WILL EXPECT GOVERNMENT WILL CREATE EMPLOYMENT BUT DUE TO SEBI S FREQUENT AMENDMENTS IT MAY LEADS TO REDUCTION OF EMPLOYMENT.HOW IT IS USEFUL TO NATION?DIRECT OPTION IS GOING TO EAT REGULAR PLANS AND WHO WILL ANSWER TO THE ADVISERS VOWS?
    Sonia Gupta · 5 years ago `
    Country having too much of laws has little justice. Our bureaucrats as well as politicians are totally indifferent towards the causes of general public. These regulators are made to protect investors , depositors. Are they able to protect any one ? Where was SEBI when ILFS diverted funds. So the case is the companies took away crores of Rupees of the public. These regulator always wake up after the companies defaulted. So friends our voice is “ nakarkhane ki tutee”
    PRAHLAD DAS KHATOD · 5 years ago `
    SEBI IS SUPREME BODY. BUT SEBI SHOULD CLEAR WHAT HE WANTS. SEBI SHOULD LOGICALLY
    TELL ABOUT EVERY STEP HE IS TAKING. IN 2009 ON JUNE 30 ENRY LOAD WAS WITHDRAWN AND SERVICE CHARGE WAS LEVIED BUT NO BODY GAVE SERVICE CHARGE. THAN SEBI WHAT STEP HAS TAKEN. ENTRY LOAD WAS 2.25% IN COMPARISION TO THAT TR. CHARGES RS. 150/100 IS NEGLIGEBLE.
    WHATEVER STEP MAY BE THERE THEY SHOULD SHOW THE REASONS SPECIALLY CURTAILING THE BENEFIT OF IFAS. WE ALL KNOWS THAT THERE IS NO SALARY,MOBILE, CONVEANCE & OTHER OFFICE CHARGES ARE NOT PAID TO IFAS. GOVT. SHOULD INTERFERE IN THIS MATTER, IF SEBI HARRESES TO SMALL DEPOSIT COLLECTORS(IFAS).
    THANKS.
    Boodugere Nagaraj. · 5 years ago `
    All these comments made by the IFAs should be sent to SEBI chief and the Finance Minister

    Further the statutory warning should be changed as " RETURN OF AMOUNT INVESTED IN MUTUAL FUND, OR PAYMENT OF DIVIDEND THEREON , ARE NOT ASSURED/ GUARANTEED " Investors are to be warned by the Distributors that they are investing in mutual funds at their own risk and peril.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.