SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Allow fund houses allocate some expenses in direct plans, AMFI requests SEBI

    Allow fund houses allocate some expenses in direct plans, AMFI requests SEBI

    It is claimed that marketing costs and other expenses in direct plans have gone up due to low volume.
    Nishant Patnaik Feb 13, 2019

    AMC officials are claiming that they have been facing difficulty in maintaining difference between the expense ratio of direct and regular plans to the extent of the distribution commission.

    In a letter sent to SEBI, AMFI has requested the market regulator to allow fund houses to allocate some expenses in direct plans.

    Earlier, SEBI had clarified that all fees and expenses charged in a direct plan (in percentage terms) under various heads including the investment and advisory fee should not exceed the fees and expenses charged under such heads in a regular plan. Simply put, the difference between the expense ratio of direct and regulator plans would now be to the extent of distribution commission.

    However, the expense ratio of direct plans has reportedly gone up under the new TER regime. Fund officials said that expenses incurred towards KYC and marketing costs such as printing of application form and fact sheets has increased due to lower volume of direct plans.

    Since the volume of regular plans is significant, the benefit of economies of scale comes into picture that reduces such costs. However, this may not be possible for AMCs in direct plans, said fund officials. Currently, many fund houses charge most expenses on AUM basis.

    AMFI said, “It is submitted that it will be more appropriate to allocate some expenses, due to their nature, among regular and direct plans based on transaction count, folio count. We therefore request SEBI to address this with suitable clarification.”

    If SEBI allows fund houses to go for such pricing in a few components of direct plans, the TER could go up or down depending on volume of direct plans.

    Further, AMFI has sought clarification from SEBI if fund houses need to issue a notification to investors if they reduce TER. “Selling and distribution expense component in the regular plan component will keep changing depending of flows, AUM size, brokerage rates, sales activities etc. This will therefore, necessitate adjustment of management fees in the regular plan to ensure that the overall TER limits are adhered to. The above will entail alignment of management fees in the direct plan, which will result in a change in the base TER of the direct plan. It is our understanding that such a change, if downwards, will not necessitate an advance notification to investors.”

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    11 Comments
    KB · 5 years ago `
    At the same time, the extra commission allocated for B-30 cities should also be charged to Direct or float have a separate NAV for them. Why should regular bear the brunt of the extra incentive
    Vikas · 5 years ago
    Very rightly said
    Reply
    Shashank Rane · 5 years ago `
    Why Direct funds have to bear such cost where investor directly takes a fund from AMC's...no agent or advisor is involved...SEBI should not allow this to happen in the interest of direct funds investors
    Sanjay jotwani · 5 years ago `
    The regular plans are bearing all the expenses. The direct plans are free from all expenses. This is incorrect.

    Also in amc offices, the direct clients visit while the distributors visit are less. Hence even the entire office expenses are charged to regular plans.

    As a distributor, we don't need amc offices. Hence AMC should charge all office expenses including staff salaries to direct plans.

    ARVIND PRASAD · 5 years ago
    Very true in respect to minimize the TER our humble request to all the AMC kindly close all the offices across B30 location and if possible include T30 also or inspite of that if they required office kindly switch it from regular to direct mode to control the TER of regular plan .we as an IFA don't required the office support we are also on the investor side and think for the betterment of the investor as SEBI . After that we will see kisme kitna hai dum.
    Koushik Ash · 5 years ago
    That's very logical. Very seldom we advisors visit AMC offices and in this case regular plans should also be restrained from the office running expenses and staffs salaries to that extent.
    Another issue which I don't find logical is all these restrictions and transparency factors, rules and regulations is imposed on Mutual Fund industry only. Why Insurance industry is not that much kept under surveillance.
    Pragnesh · 5 years ago
    Why only Mutual fund, also keep such transparency in all products be it financial or non financial # Like Property / FMCG / Any Service Industry (whether regulated by SEBI or other Body or GOI).

    We all IFA's work hard to get investor, handle their all emotions when there is volatility and keep them invested in funds to safe guard their interest first
    Reply
    Vikas Gupta · 5 years ago `
    I totally agree with Mr ARVIND PRASAD & Mr Koushik Ash. Office expanses including Staff salary should be from Direct Plans. Please implement all these Investor related benefits in all Financial products.
    Rajesh · 5 years ago `
    Very true, in last 5 years, I never visited any AMC office which is sufficient enough proof that even without any support of local AMC office, a distributor can easily work. So better to close all the amc offices to further reduce the cost which may be passed on to the so called DIRECT investors. Mutual Funds Sahi Hai !!!
    Ratnesh · 5 years ago `
    Too much disgusting , why investors bear any cost in direct plan. AMC CAN forcely charge from investors in direct plan
    Jay prakash Yadav · 5 years ago `
    Good idea...because direct fund investors want knowledge henceforth visit office...so this cost to direct plan....or AMC should divide mark to mark expense ratio as compared to volume of direct and regular plan...direct plan not cost of regular plan...
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.