SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News On what basis fund houses give preferential treatment to a few distributors: SEBI audit

    On what basis fund houses give preferential treatment to a few distributors: SEBI audit

    SEBI wants to know methodology behind various commission slabs that fund houses follow.
    Nishant Patnaik Jun 9, 2019

    SEBI auditors have reportedly asked a few fund houses about the methodology they follow to give preferential treatment to select distributors. Simply put, SEBI wants to know various AUM slabs that fund houses follow to arrive at trail commission offered to distributors.

    Currently, most fund houses follow AUM slabs to arrive at trail commission. The more business you give to a fund house, the better would be your commission structure. As a result, fund houses give attractive commission rates to their large distributors such as banks, NDs and large IFAs.

    A senior official of a fund house who has received this query told Cafemutual that the market regulator is checking whether fund houses are paying commission more than the TER of a scheme. “This exercise is to ensure that fund houses are not paying distributors additional commission from their books. Basically, SEBI wants to see if fund houses pay commission within the TER limits.”

    Another query to a few fund houses is relating to IAP corpus to educate investors.

    Please note that these queries have surfaced from SEBI’s ongoing audit. Cafemutual has checked the credibility of this story with seven AMCs of which four fund houses have said that they have received such queries.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    11 Comments
    Babbu kumar singh · 5 years ago `
    AMC's must distribute trail commission equally to all IFA's and corporate chenals. Sebi has to pay attention on corporate chenals as well as banks on miss sell. Investors are confused between regular and direct scheme. They are not well known about mutual fund industries. IFA's have been managing investment behave of investors as well as provide better services to their clients to generate wealth. But now a day IFA's are ignored by AMC's as well as sebi that may be a biggest cause of growing mutual fund industries and economic of our country.
    Rajesh · 5 years ago `
    There is wide difference between brokerage rate given to small IFA and bid individual IFA too.The difference in brokerage rate is between 0.50- 1% among Individual IFAs. In other financial or insurance products, the rate of brokerage is same, why same practise is not followed here? If uniform rate of brokerage is followed, it will solve many current problems as there is existence crises of roughly 50000 small IFAs after TER cut. One argument by Big individual IFA is they will earn less, but if you have got more AUM, or bring in more businee, you are going to get more revenue with uniform brokerage rate too. SEBI advisory committee must reconsider the current practice followed by AMCs and it will solve the problems like above automatically.
    Manan Bapna · 5 years ago `
    SEBI should also see that all those who are promoting the online Direct Investments, they dont get paid in anyways from AMCs.
    P N Chowdhury · 5 years ago `
    Those who are (IFA ) having more AUM they are maintained staff, office, pay GST pay 30% + IT . To my mind brokerage slab may be higher. All qualified IAS are not getting same position IAS, IFS, IRS etc respectively.
    Gaurav Kshirsagar · 5 years ago `
    Preferential brokerage rates will again lead to misselling As these rates are based on the amount of business one gives to particular Amc. Moreover it is injustice with an IFA who has less business with AMC as he is now getting even less than the difference between TER of regular and direct scheme in some cases.
    rupesh mundhra · 5 years ago `
    It's AMC discretion but it should be within the TER
    rupesh mundhra · 5 years ago `
    It's AMC discretion but it should be within the TER
    rupesh mundhra · 5 years ago `
    It's AMC discretion but it should be within the TER
    Rakesh C Popat · 5 years ago `
    On the old assets Amcs are paying commissions less than TER which leads to unnecessary churning of portfolios. For eg after ter cut i am receiving brokerage in icici pru bluechip fund only 14 bps for which i was receiving 40 bps before TER cut.I normally do not believe in unnecessary churning of portfolios as i always suggest goal based planning for my clients.In hdfc top 100 fund i am receiving only 10 bps for my old assets.There should be only one brokerage structure for one scheme payable to all the distributors whether small or big.

    Nishantjee, kindly probe into above matter seriously as it is unjustified and unacceptable.
    Mohammad Umair · 5 years ago `
    No idea how commission is calculated I am recieving 10bps commission on some of my old assets
    Rajeev dhagat · 5 years ago `
    easy kyc process online?
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.