SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Ban upfront commission, shift to all trail commission model in PMS: SEBI committee

    Ban upfront commission, shift to all trail commission model in PMS: SEBI committee

    A SEBI working group has recommended that the PMS industry should ban upfront to reduce mis-selling and move to all trail model to compensate their distributors.
    Nishant Patnaik & Sridhar Kumar Sahu Aug 3, 2019

    SEBI has issued a consultation paper in which its working group on PMS has proposed that the PMS industry should ban upfront commission and move to all trail model to compensate their distributors to reduce mis-selling.

    SEBI said, “Generally, it has been observed that 100% of the upfront fees / set up fees charged to the Client are paid as commission to the Distributor. With a view to curtail mis-selling and to prevent distributors pushing up- fronted products, the working group has recommended that distributor commission shall be only on trail basis. Trail-based income shall also ensure that the portfolio manager does not strain business calls, which will hamper his longevity.”

    Among other key recommendations of the working group are

    Distributor related proposals

    • Distributors selling PMS will have to mandatorily disclose their commission
    • SEBI to set a common minimum qualification criterion for PMS distributors
    • For now, portfolio managers can utilize services of mutual fund distributors. This will be valid till a separate certification examination announced for the PMS distributors
    • Distributors should clearly disclose their services i.e. if they offer “advisory” or “execution only” services
    • Distributors cannot indicate or assure returns
    • The onus of ensuring that the distributors follow the ‘Code of Conduct’ shall lie with the portfolio managers

    Industry related proposals

    • Operating expenses excluding brokerage will be capped at 0.50% per annum along with custody charges of 10bps or actual whichever is lower and audit fee/notary charges/ miscellaneous of 25 bps or actual whichever is lower
    • Broking charges can be charged to clients account as expense at actuals
    • Maximum exit load of 3% on redemption within a year, 2% on redemption within 2 years and 1% on redemption within 3 years. There will be no exit load after 3 years
    • Minimum threshold limit to invest in PMS to be increased from Rs.25 lakh to Rs.50 lakh
    • Ease of on boarding clients: Custody should allow digital signature for account opening
    • Performance fee should be charged on ‘without catch up’ basis i.e. performance fee to be charged only the amount over and above a hurdle rate

    SEBI has invited feedback of all stakeholders by August 30, 2019. You can send your comments at pmsreview@sebi.gov.in via email.

     

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    4 Comments
    Raghavan Pattathil · 4 years ago `
    Hi Friends
    Have seen the growth of Mutual Funds and also the Growth of many many AMCs, as I have been there through out these entire period of Introduction of Mutual Fund Platforms and related Regulators' expansion of Regulatory Business. Cannot calculate, whether the MF business has grown more or Regulatory Controls have gone up more?

    The Industry, which had started looking up in terms of AUMs, have slowly started seeing Erosions in AUMs on account of unwanted regulations and rejections of application for silly reasons. A person, who has a KYC compliant Bank account, applies for a Mutual Fund product through their account, if his application is rejected by an AMC, feels aggrieved, who has to be blamed? Is it the fault of Regulator called RBI or another Regulator called SEBI? But the allergy of EYES' meet of these Regulators irks the investing Public, and they are prepared to go back to their age old friend, the Banking system. This is only one such story. there are many such stories.
    RANJAN · 4 years ago
    Sebi does not want MF industry to grow at faster speed. It is always talking about TER/ EXPENSE RATIO. But on the other hand small investors lost lakhs of crore due to surcharge on FPI on account of wrong decision by finance minister. That is overlooked. She could have stopped this high outflow by consoling FPIs with some statement that the matter will be looked into. So ultimate inference is neither SEBI nor FINANCE ministry like MF Industry and Stock market to grow. Modi hi should take account of this situation before it is too late. RBI failed to assess that interest rate in INDIA is too high .It is just predicting what will be the inflation after few months. On that basis it controls the rate of interest. Why RBI has taken up the role of astrologer. Decisions should be taken on momentary requirement. It ignored that high interest rate increaseing NPA in banking system at the same time economy is getting slower
    Reply
    Bhavesh Sheth · 4 years ago `
    Dear Friends,

    I think the market regulator is carrying on its rightful duties and issuing further norms / rules / directives which is requiring updating from time to time with the experience in the industry. in effect i believe SEBI should be commended for bringing out measures from time to time and not sleeping which is by far the norm in the industry.

    I am sure that the interest of SEBI as the market regulator is to promote the business of the industry and its players in fair and equitable manner and this will ensure a sustained growth of the industry and all its players.

    many thanks to the regulator for keeping its eyes open throughout.!!!!!!!

    regards

    Bhavesh
    Sam · 4 years ago
    Well explained. The market regulator is doing its job very clearly and judiciously. Regulator is taking actions for the goodness of the investors . Though sometimes people feel it's irritating, it's for the better future of the investing public. Kudos to SEBI for it.
    Reply
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.