SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News A few fund houses offer higher trail commission in the first year

    A few fund houses offer higher trail commission in the first year

    At least seven fund houses have been offering higher trail commission in the first year and lower in subsequent years to select distributors.
    Nishant Patnaik Aug 7, 2019

    A few fund houses have been offering higher trail commission in the first year and lower in subsequent years to select distributors.

    In fact, a public disclosure on schedule of commission available on an MNC bank website shows that a few fund houses have been offering 1.65% as the first year trail commission and 0.65% in the second year, a difference of 1%.

    A CEO of the large fund house requesting anonymity said that it would go against the spirit of SEBI circular to ban upfront commission. He further said that such a variation in trail commission across fund houses would encourage churning of portfolio.

    According to him, SEBI is said to have noted this practice and may ask fund houses to pay uniform trail commission across the investment tenure.

    On legality of this structure, a senior official offering such a structure said that fund houses have been paying trial commission within the ambit of regulation. “In most cases, we arrive at commission structure after discussing with our distributors. While a few distributors demand higher brokerage in the initial years to run their businesses, most distributors prefer uniform trail commission. Offering commission is a business decision as long as it is under the distributable TER.”

    Citing an example, he said, “With an AUM of Rs.10,000 crore and distributable TER of 1%, a fund can offer up to Rs.100 crore from the scheme as trail commission. Now, it is prerogative of fund houses on how they want to distribute it among their distributors. Typically, distributors who give higher business get better structure.”

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    4 Comments
    Debraj Sengupta · 4 years ago `
    Many big AMC have resorted to abysmally low trail commission on Old Assets e.g. 10-15bps. However, the same AMC s are paying good brokerage for incremental or new Assets. T30/B30 incentives are also quite high. The same asset after 2-3years will attract very low brokerage as above. This way indirectly they are encouraging churning. Post TER cut many big distributors mainly Banks and NDs may have loose interest in MF. AMCs get chunk of their business from this institutional client so does
    DEBRAJ SENGUPTA · 4 years ago `
    Designated RM jobs. AMFI and SEBI should try to bring in transparency in these malpractices. Code of conduct etc. to be implemented strictly
    Thirupathi Rao · 4 years ago `
    Banks with all the details of the customers calling them and getting bulk of Mutual funds investments and mostly they prefer cross selling Insurance products. Majority of the banks are selling their respective fund schemes and respective companies policies only. This is clearly mentioned and printed the percentage of their respective share Mutual funds products. There are possibilities of wrong selling also takes place in the process.
    The main activity of the commercial Banks is to receive deposits and carry out lending activities, thus expected to act as trustees of Public funds. We observe NPAs are piling up year after year due to the reasons known to every body.
    Is it correct allowing so much of NPAs for the sake few crores of commission ? How much diversion of funds are taking place from the expected end use.
    An example, If diversion of 40% of One lakh crores Advances, takes place( say 40,000 crores) in two three years , what is the use to a bank, if the commission income of 100 crore of a mutual fund canvasing of 10000 crores.Man power requirement,and time spent on the service ( which may be redeemed in say after 3 years) what is the return rate for the bank.
    A discussion at the highest level may be useful between authorities to set right loop holes in the process and let not allow NPAs pileup at the cost of other income.
    Thirupathi Rao · 4 years ago `
    Banks with all the details of the customers calling them and getting bulk of Mutual funds investments and mostly they prefer cross selling Insurance products. Majority of the banks are selling their respective fund schemes and respective companies policies only. This is clearly mentioned and printed the percentage of their respective share Mutual funds products. There are possibilities of wrong selling also takes place in the process.
    The main activity of the commercial Banks is to receive deposits and carry out lending activities, thus expected to act as trustees of Public funds. We observe NPAs are piling up year after year due to the reasons known to every body.
    Is it correct allowing so much of NPAs for the sake few crores of commission ? How much diversion of funds are taking place from the expected end use.
    An example, If diversion of 40% of One lakh crores Advances, takes place( say 40,000 crores) in two three years , what is the use to a bank, if the commission income of 100 crore of a mutual fund canvasing of 10000 crores.Man power requirement,and time spent on the service ( which may be redeemed in say after 3 years) what is the return rate for the bank.
    A discussion at the highest level may be useful between authorities to set right loop holes in the process and let not allow NPAs pileup at the cost of other income.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.