SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Road to safety: SEBI re-categorizes credit risk funds, corporate bond fund and banking & PSU funds

    Road to safety: SEBI re-categorizes credit risk funds, corporate bond fund and banking & PSU funds

    SEBI has asked fund houses to increase their allocation to safer debt securities like g-sec and treasury bills by reducing their existing holdings in AA+ and above rated instruments.
    Sridhar Kumar Sahu May 19, 2020

    In a bit to make the debt fund category safer, SEBI has redefined corporate bond fund, credit risk fund and banking & PSU funds. In these three debt fund categories, fund managers can now increase their exposure to safer debt securities like g-secs and treasury bills.

    SEBI has asked fund houses to reduce their exposure to AA+ securities by 15% of fund’s assets and deploy this corpus in g-secs and treasury bills.

    With this, corporate bond funds will have to reduce their exposure to AA+ and above rated instruments from 80% to 65%. Similarly in credit risk funds, the minimum investment in AA and below rated corporate bonds has been reduced to 50% from 65%.

    In banking & PSU funds, the minimum investment in debt instruments of banks, public sector undertakings, public financial institutions and municipal bonds has been revised to 65% from 80%.

    Table

    Category

    Revised scheme characteristics

    Earlier scheme characteristics

    Corporate bond fund

    Min 65% of total AUM to be invested in AA+ above rated corporate bonds

    Min 80% of total AUM to be invested in AA+ above rated corporate bonds

    Credit risk fund

    Min 50% of total AUM to be invested in AA and below rated corporate bonds

    Min 65% of total AUM to be invested in AA and below rated corporate bonds

    Banking & PSU fund

    Min 65% of total AUM in debt instruments of banks, public sector undertakings, public financial institutions and municipal bonds

    Min 80% of total AUM in debt instruments of banks, public sector undertakings, public financial institutions and municipal bonds

     

    SEBI said that the changed characteristics of these three debt funds are valid till August 18.

    SEBI has changed the characteristics of these three debt funds after industry body AMFI wrote to the market regulator. Fund houses sought permission to increase exposure in G-sec and T-bills, as corporate bonds have turned out to be less liquid and riskier due to the covid-19 outbreak.

    As on April 30, AUM of corporate bond funds stood around Rs 86,290 crore, AUM of credit risk funds at Rs 35,220 crore and AUM of banking & PSU funds at Rs 79,240 crore.

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    3 Comments
    PURNA CHANDRA ROUT · 4 years ago `
    SEBI has given the instructions to all AMCs to increase the ratio of G sec. and Treasury Bill to the funds like CREDIT RISK FUNDS, CORPORATE BOND FUND and BANKING and PSU FUNDS.But now the question that their are some fund houses who lost the Investors croers of their hard-earned invested money due to the SEBI's poor guidance on AMC(FUND MANAGERS-DEBT) as well as the Fund managers(debt) lightly steps taken for investment in some Default Companies.Altmately most of our investors lost their hard-earned money.When this defult matters is happening regularly since last year onwards,then the SEBI became so reacting and doing some measures to check the problems.But why should SEBI did not take the pre-measures to keep the heavy loss of Investors who already lost their hard-earned money invested such like funds-Medium Term funds,Credit Risk Funds and etc.What type of measures have taken by the SEBI on these AMCS when there is regular defaults have been occurring (Some AMCs) since last 8-9months.Please think the matters and how this Wii be solved.
    Prashant · 4 years ago `
    So after the floods the regulator wants to erect a wall. How will this safeguard the investors who invested in the 6 wound up schemes of Franklin? Till date no press release and no notification from them except a plead to Franklin to give money to the investors fast. What kind of the regulator have we got? Why franklin people are not punished? Why are they not made to buy the portfolio from investors and give them their money? IN fact not even a fine to the AMC so far. What does it mean?
    Mukesh Gupta · 4 years ago `
    I fail to understand the credit risk category. There is no stipulation about other categories about how much credit thay can take. Innocent investors/DIY put money in other categories thinking these safe catagory whereas fund manager take any kind of credit risk.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.