SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Supreme Court disposes Franklin Templeton MF’s scheme winding case

    Supreme Court disposes Franklin Templeton MF’s scheme winding case

    A group of investors who filed a writ petition to challenge the fund house’s decision to wind up six debt funds have withdrawn their case today.
    Team Cafemutual Jun 13, 2020

    The Supreme Court has disposed a case related to winding up of schemes by Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund after a group of investors who filed a writ petition to challenge the fund house’s decision have withdrawn their appeal today.

    With this, there will be no further hearing in this case.

    In a statement sent to Cafemutual, the Franklin Templeton spokesperson said, “With reference to the status of the writ petition filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against Union of India, SEBI, Franklin Templeton etc., we wish to confirm that the matter was dismissed as withdrawn when it was taken up by the court today.”

    In another case, the fund house has appealed to the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat High Court decision to stay the e-voting exercise of Franklin Templeton India Mutual Fund. “Apropos the interim stay order on the unitholders meeting issued by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court, Franklin Templeton has filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the matter is sub judice,” said the fund house.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    4 Comments
    DR PK Moghe · 4 years ago `
    I doubt investors would ever get their full refunds. This all court drama seems to be a fixed match to keep retail investors hopeful (but actually hanging). The poor rated quality papers which FT bought for those closed down schemes will hardly be encashed / honoured (especially during this economic recession). I wonder where is the securitization / collateral that a fund manager is supposed to keep while directly giving loans to corporates. Why FT does not dispose off the collaterals and refund the money to the retail investors. ??? No body is raising this point.
    Ravindra Anturkar · 4 years ago `
    Someone should br answerable , responsible , how such wrong decision was taken , what was the intention. Presently when investors will get money , hiw much money investers will get ,no one knows and tellls . Investors aged 78, 80 , can nit sustain this shock. What to do now ?
    DEBRAJ SENGUPTA · 4 years ago `
    I would like to draw upon an inference here may be disliked by many and strong protest will come. Let me explain this. It is the simplest way for Investors and Distributors alike to throw entire blame on FT. Yes, they did wrong by investing in illiquid and under rated papers in funds like Ultra-Short term or Low Duration funds and to an extent in Short Term Opportunities fund. But there was I presume NO WRONG in choosing such papers in portfolios of INCOME OPPORTUNITIES, CREDIT RISK and DYNAMIC ACCRUAL FUNDS. As name suggests these schemes would bargain hunt best possible rates in the markets and comes with commensurate risk. What wen wrong actually is hard selling past returns in these schemes by battery of distributors and lapped up by investors of any age[ super senior citizens too]. What they failed to understand or paid attention to is the quality of each portfolios and risks attached to it. When we stick our neck out for that EXTRA RETURN away from the comforts of Fixed Deposit we hardly recognize the cardinal principle, HIGHER THE RISK , HIGHER THE RETURN. Now after Return chasing looks over we have everyone to blame - SEBI, RBI, GOI, FT[ both domestic or international parent]. One failed to acknowledge that the same FT with equally poor Equity returns for past few years have done splendid jobs in FT US Opportunities fund - FOF which generated double-digit returns for investors in rupee term. So going forward we need to understand our risk appetite first and then look for that EXTRA RETURN . This will not let us end up with helplessness and throwing tantrums.
    Pradeep Kumar Arora · 4 years ago
    Debraj - i totally endorse yourviews. But Ultra Short Term is the largest fund that is impacted and that should have had better quality paper. However, now i dont know whats the use of the litigation,. A forensic enquiry by SEBI should be followed by with the winding down process. If FT is found guilty in the enquiry then punitive action, beneficial to investors should be taken. But what is the purpose of the court case by harrasement of minority holders by some big investor who will perhaps cut a private deal to withdraw
    Reply
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.