SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Why SEBI asked AMFI to temporarily discontinue B30 incentive?

    Why SEBI asked AMFI to temporarily discontinue B30 incentive?

    The market regulator has found inconsistencies in implementation of B30 norms by both - AMCs and distributors.
    Nishant Patnaik Mar 10, 2023

    Listen to this article

    Last week, SEBI has asked AMFI to temporarily bar fund houses from charging additional expenses in lieu of B30 retail assets for a month. This suspension will be lifted once fund houses put in place a mechanism to monitor and track misuse of B30 incentive norms.

    In a letter to AMFI, SEBI said that it has found inconsistencies in implementation of B30 norms by both – AMCs and distributors. Let us look at both:

    AMCs

    Inconsistency in calculating B30 incentives: SEBI has found that a few AMCs did not calculate B30 expenses in line with SEBI guidance. While these AMCs calculated B30 expenses on daily basis, they reconciliated the accrued expenses on weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual basis, which is not in compliance with the AMFI best practices guidelines. This has a major impact on NAVs, said SEBI. AMFI norms say that AMCs must reconcile accrued B30 expenses every week.

    Including switch transactions to charge B30 expenses: A few AMCs considered switch transaction of up to Rs.2 lakh to charge B30 expenses. SEBI said it is not in the spirit of regulations as the market regulator has specified that B30 expenses can be charged only for new inflows.

    Charging B30 expenses at AMC's discretion: A few AMCs charged B30 expenses based on their discretion. They did not charge B30 expenses despite B30 inflows in a few schemes. Also, there were instances in which a few AMCs charged B30 expenses for a particular period. SEBI said, “This practice is arbitrary in nature and may lead to anti-competitive practices through cross subsidizing of the TER across schemes.”

    Distributors

    Splitting of transaction: SEBI has found instances of splitting of transaction by a few MFDs to keep the investment amount less than Rs.2 lakh to earn higher B30 incentive. SEBI’s internal algorithm found close to 6000 such instances amounting to Rs.92 crore between FY 2019 and 2022.

    Churning of investments: There were 2000 instances of churning across 19 fund houses involving an amount of Rs.3.32 crore. The churning happened after one year of investment. A few MFDs made redemption request on behalf of their clients and reinvested in the same scheme after 5 days to avail B30 incentives.

    Currently, AMCs can charge an additional 30 bps for bringing retail application of up to Rs.2 lakh from B30 cities. Fund houses use this additional TER to incentivize distributors for bringing retail investors from B30 cities.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    11 Comments
    rakesh popat · 1 year ago `
    Sebi should lower B-30 incentives and increase the limit of investment from 2 lakhs to 5 lakhs. Also increase exit load period for pure equity schemes from 1 year to 2 years.Also B-30 incentives should be claw backed if redeemed or switched within 2 years of investment.There should be proper system so that distributors and AMC's concentrate more on business rather than compliance.
    Last updated 1 year ago
    Chandan Chandra · 1 year ago
    your suggestion is 100% correct.
    Reply
    Manjunath M J · 1 year ago `
    It's high time the Government should constitute MFRDA similar to IRDA, SEBI has its own issues to resolve, MFD's also need support in all forms, and MFDs also should get heard fairly from the Government and SEBI. 
    Suresh Kumar ranka · 1 year ago `
    Why sebi is not controlling to insurance company?are insurance company not investing in equity then only AMC are under sebi?
    Lic investmented in ADANI
    Where is sebi
    What is the need of AMFI it should be control by sebi only where as IRDA is not under sebi
    Sebi should do their work AMC are under AMFI
    Tushar Desai · 1 year ago
    true
    Reply
    SANTANU GUHA · 1 year ago `
    Actually everything is revolving around brokerages paid to MFD.What ever 30 is there SEBI's target is only the brokerag paid to MFD.Rather SEBI should incentivise the Individual MFDs more to attract more distributors into the system.Because SEBI should have a plan in place to make the MF industry a 100 lakh crore sector in the next 5 to 10 years.
    Rahul Chatterjee · 1 year ago `
    True
    Manash Paul · 1 year ago `
    Once again the regulator has questioned the integrity of Individual ARN. This is pure disgrace & disrespect for people practicing this profession.

    In this profession if Distributor dedicate his hardwork for 10 years or more then he is likely to get some below average income which is not sufficient for his present or retirement.

    There is an element of Life Risk as well while traveling.

    It takes time to earn a customer in this profession, since there is a risk of losing value from Principal & uncertainty "when the Principal would pay some returns".

    It takes generous amount of time to acquire a customer & generally a customer flees when he gets unpleasant experience like Buying at overvalued & selling at undervalued.

    Customers are very overwhelming in Nature they bring more Investment when market is at peak & avoid engaging when the markets are in South.

    At their times of need they wind up their Mutual Fund Investment First.

    Further the news resources from media is also very ill decisive to keep investment. They trigger liquidation irrespective of loss or profit.

    So It's not always solely the MFD that play the ultimate role in investment process Investor participate majorly according to their needs & mindset.

    In nutshell MFD have to absorb the brunt of viz,

    1. Stock Market Movement & Bad News.

    2. Regulatory challenges.

    3. Poor Living of Majority of MFD.

    4. Lifestyle Disease & Hazards.

    5. Quick Redemption decision by Investor due to uncertain returns.

    In times to come this profession will be avoided & the mentorship would be lost.
    BeauSancy Consulting · 1 year ago `
    AMFI only talks about conduct of MFD and nothing, no code of conduct for AMC. The AMC (IDFC, HDFC, Birla, Kotak, all CAMS serviced thick skinned AMC) forfeit brokerage worth thousands on flimsy grounds and there is no way to know. MFD go back and forth between AMC and CAMS/KFIN. On complaint to SEBI (SEBIE/MH23/0000664/1, SEBIE/MH23/0000662/1, & SEBIE/KN23/0000039/1, AMC will get it closed without giving any actual details of transactions and reason for forfeiture but submit false and stereotype response, SEBI will send closure report wherein it will be told, it is not their jurisdiction, MFD to approach AMFI against AMC. AMFI has no mechanism of grievance redressal against AMC. AMC can do whatever they want. Commission structure and statements are so complex that you will never know what you got what is lost.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.