SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News Lower commission doesn’t necessarily translate into churning: Report

    Lower commission doesn’t necessarily translate into churning: Report

    Data shows that distributors do not prefer churning to earn additional commission.
    Nishant Patnaik Jun 21, 2023

    Listen to this article

    A report released by Kotak Institutional Equities reveals that lower commission doesn’t necessarily translate into churning of investment portfolio by distributors.

    In fact, the industry shows that distributors do not prefer churning portfolio to earn an additional commission of 30-35 bps.

    The report reveals that despite giving lower commission compared to other schemes, funds which have performed well have seen a rise in inflows from distributors. The report said, “AUM share of all funds above Rs.50 bn has increased over the last three years. This is despite almost 4:1 ratio in terms of increased availability of smaller funds which on average pay ~30 bps higher distribution commission. Similarly, the same analysis for funds over Rs100 bn size. For larger funds as well we see rise in AUM share despite almost ~35 bps lower commission rate. Both indicate that despite lower commission rates, distributors are not able to (or do not prefer to) completely churn the back book for various reasons.”

    The report says that distributors look at past fund performance, brand recall and its perception among investors to pick funds. It also says that distributors also look at continuous education, on ground reach and support provided by AMCs to shortlist schemes for their clients.

    Talking about impact of the proposed TER regulations, the company said, “We believe the impact of TER regulations should be seen in terms of (1) existing stock of AUM, which is much better-protected against commission differences and (2) incremental flows, which are as much influenced by performance as by distribution payout, if not more.”

    Further, the report said, “Distribution commission is just one of the factors that drive flows. In our view, its influence is likely much lower on the existing stock of assets due to an existing steady trail fee, which is built over years.”

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    7 Comments
    Anurag Dureha · 1 year ago `
    This report can be an EYE OPENER to SEBI who is under the illusion that by making stronger schemes less incentivised for the distributors, SEBI is doing justice to innocent investors.
    InvestAir Funds · 1 year ago `
    The problem is not with the commission but with the partial commission structure. Bigger fund houses give minuscule commissions and promise 0.1%-0.15% higher commissions for abnormally higher targets of investment. They give much higher (sometimes twice the commission) to Banks and NDs. I do prefer AMCs like PPFAS which are clear in commission structure and give equal commission to all and their Commission structure is available on their website.
    Deepak Khurana · 1 year ago
    Agree
    Reply
    Vivek Mallik · 1 year ago `
    You do not mention that this report is on Individual distributors only or it includes banks (as distributors) as well.
    I feel only individual distributors have 'client first' as their motto. Banks (as distributors) are known to sell products that may not fit into the client's requirements, just for the sake of meeting targets.
    InvestAir Funds · 1 year ago
    Absolutely correct! banks are the biggest mis-sellers and many a time they sell insurance in the name of SIPs, because insurance give much higher commission to banks.
    Reply
    Smartinvestmdu · 1 year ago `
    I agree to this comment,
    VISHAL NILKANTH · 1 year ago `
    higher Commission is also important for Distributors, because many distributors are only depends on Mutual Fund Business, so our request to Sebi and all Amc to please Launch and execute new B30 Commision structure Earlier to atleast Fullfill mutual fund distributors Needs and its household expenses...
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.