SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News MFs seek confirmation from investors if MFDs are second/third holder in joint MF folios

    MFs seek confirmation from investors if MFDs are second/third holder in joint MF folios

    AMFI has issued a declaration form seeking confirmation from unit holders of the first holder or other joint holders to see if the name of the distributor has been added with their consent or knowledge.
    Nishant Patnaik Feb 29, 2024

    Listen to this article

    SEBI has asked fund houses through AMFI to seek confirmation from unitholders where they find MFDs’ name as the second or the third holder in joint MF folios.

    This has come after SEBI reportedly found a few instances where MFDs have put their name as the second and third holder in the joint MF folios without the knowledge or consent of investors.

    In fact, AMFI has issued a declaration form seeking confirmation from unit holders of the first holder or other joint holders to see if the name of the distributor has been added with their consent or knowledge.

    A senior fund official told Cafemutual that this exercise is currently happening in a handful of folios; however, SEBI has asked RTAs to find out all folios having MFDs as the second and third holder in joint MF folios and send the list to AMCs to verify its veracity and obtain consent from investors.

    Currently, a few fund houses have been reaching out to MFDs clients to verify if they are aware of the distributor as the second and third holder in their joint MF folio.

    In one such communication, the fund house wrote to investors of such folios urging them to send declaration within 15 days. However, the fund house said if they do not receive any communication from such investors, the fund house will remove the name of the MFD from the joint MF holding.  

    A few fund houses said that removal of MFDs’ name from joint MF folios on non-receipt of declaration will be unfair if the case is genuine. These fund houses say that they will call such investors and urge them to send the declaration at the earliest.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    8 Comments
    Money Kare Srinivasan · 2 months ago `
    This can be time consuming excercise, the Amc's can use technology and trigger notification when there happens to be a financial or non-financial transaction. Based on the case they can request the approval of the investor.
    Deepak R Shamdasani · 2 months ago `
    I suggest the RTAs or AMCs should send letters to the primary holders informing them about one of the holders is MFD and in case they have objection and seek removal only then they Should Respond in case of no response it will be deemed that they have no objection
    Deepak R Shamdasani · 2 months ago `
    In my opinion in most of the cases the MFDs are secondary holders in case their family members

    The present steps suggested are very difficult to comply with as the holders are working at different locations and 15 days time given is just impossible to comply and should be immediately put on hold or postponed

    Maybe online option should also be thought
    Deepak R Shamdasani · 2 months ago `
    Just for the Misdeeds of a few you can't churn the whole ocean therefore please find other options which are easy on the genuine holders

    Reverse process will be better option where no response is deemed as acceptance
    dipak gandhi · 2 months ago `
    Agree with Deepak R.sham..
    It's only few cases why to punish all..
    I have been second holder in all folios of my family..may b around 100..
    So as per new directives I need to furnish to all..ohhh
    Better avoid..or at the best make voice call and get consent.. alternatively provide online consent process..
    You have removed mail id and mob no fr all folios in such cases still this another step ..all becas of few MFD you are there again to harass all MFD.
    Also in new forms provide such declaration so MFD can b joint holder ...
    Laxmikant · 2 months ago `
    Yes. There are many such family folios where MFD is Second holder, in multiple AMC's.
    If regulator finds no other easier / online option to get this confirmation, I suggest a comparatively simpler suggestion. Such confirmation can be submitted at RTA level instead of AMC level.
    Sunil Lalge · 2 months ago `
    There are many such family folios where MFD is Second holder, in multiple AMC's.
    I suggest a comparatively simpler suggestion. Such confirmation can be submitted at RTA level instead of AMC level. Or
    in case they have objection and seek removal only then they Should Respond in case of no response it will be deemed that they have no objection
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.