SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News GST Bill: compliance cost may go up for AMCs and IFAs

    GST Bill: compliance cost may go up for AMCs and IFAs

    AMCs and distributors may be required to register with states to comply with GST.
    Nishant Patnaik Aug 5, 2016

    The GST Bill is expected to have a huge impact on all stakeholders of the personal finance industry – mutual funds, insurance, distributors and investors.

    In fact, AMFI has recently shared a presentation on GST and its impact on the mutual fund industry with all fund houses. PwC has prepared this report for AMFI.

    Cafemutual has a copy of this report.

    A few compliance officials of AMCs to whom Cafemutual spoke say that while operations and procedural modalities are still awaited, here is how it may affect the mutual fund industry.

    A key question that the bill raises is regarding the requirement of state specific registration and compliance. A senior fund official of a large fund house said that this will increase the cost of compliance for both AMCs and distributors. He said, “The current Bill says that the service tax has to be paid at a place where it has been consumed. AMCs and distributors have investors spread across the country. That means, both AMCs and distributors will have to register themselves with the service tax department of the respective states. This tax can be paid online but auditing and compliance need to be done at the source state.”

    This official further said that the re-introduction of reverse charge mechanism will help distributors to deal with this. He says, “AMCs anyway may have to register with all states. However, distributors can request government to put them under reverse charge mechanism which will shift the onus of paying service tax on AMCs on behalf of distributors. This could reduce the cost of compliance for distributors. However, a few distributors who earns less than Rs.10 lakh may get affected. But it would benefit all them for sure in the long term.”

    Another key issue for the industry is inclusion of securities in the definition of goods. A senior official from a bank sponsored fund house told Cafemutual that the proposed Bill has included securities in the definition of goods. “Currently, there is no service tax on securities as it doesn’t come under consumable goods. Security is an investment product. However, if the Bill is implemented in the current structure, every time a fund manager executes trade, the fund will have to pay service tax just like STT. Simply put, it will raise costs substantially and dampen the demand for this product.”

    Other key impact

    Investors: The GST Bill may also impact investors, since fund houses charge service tax on management fee. Suppose the total expense ratio (TER) is 2.50% and the scheme is charging 1% management fee, service tax is levied on management 1% fee. Fund officials say that the TER might go up by 3 to 4 basis points.

    Distributors: A senior fund official says that while government is yet to decide the quantum of service tax on various services, the service tax liability of IFAs may go up. Based on current speculation, the service tax burden of distributors earning over Rs.10 lakh may go up to 18%.

    It remains to be seen how the government and the industry deals with these issues.

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    3 Comments
    Sourabh · 7 years ago `
    Thankyou so much for bringing up this issue. We have to see how to control the cost of compliance. And the idea of reintroduction of reverse charge sounds good.
    Kunal · 7 years ago `
    In my view the whole objective of bringing GST is to remove obstacles for doing business across cities in India so let the clarity come instead of jumping on the GST implications.
    Also i do not agree or support for bringing reverse charge mechanism back as it will severely affect small IFAs. Imagine a cut of 18% GST from someone who's earning less than 10 Lakhs for the sake of less compaliance of IFAs earning more than 10 Lakhs.
    Moreover, numbers of IFAs earning less than 10 Lakhs are way higher than IFAs earning more than 10 Lakhs (Your mention of 'a few distributors who earns 10 Lakhs....'seems to be untrue)
    Jayesh Sanghani · 7 years ago `
    Limit should be raise upto 25 lakh.. so, more than 90? IFA benefited . Govt.have less burden of management
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.