SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News In five years, just 918 register as RIAs

    In five years, just 918 register as RIAs

    Even though the number of investment advisors registered with SEBI increased by 59% in one year, the pick-up has been slow even after 5 years of its introduction.
    Padmaja Choudhury May 17, 2018

     

    Even after five years, SEBI registration of investment advisory is yet to pick up. SEBI’s latest data shows that the total number of SEBI RIAs was 918 as on May 2018.

    Of the total 918 RIAs, over half of them are individuals. 

    While the industry has added 341 new SEBI RIAs in FY 2017-18, AMFI data shows that over 20,000 new MF distributors joined the industry during that period. Experts attribute this lukewarm response to lack of clarity on RIA regulations due to series of three consultation papers floated by SEBI.

    “SEBI’s consultation paper is not clear. Few distributors genuinely want to become fee-only financial planners but given the uncertainty many distributors are hesitating,” said Suresh Sadagopan of Ladder7 Financial Advisories.

    Kavitha Menon of Probitus Wealth believes that non-viability of the fee-only model deters many distributors to register as RIAs. “If the distributor is receiving healthy commission then there is little incentive for a distributor to become an RIA. RIA model requires high cost of compliance and attracts overhead expenses,” said Kavitha.

    Another reason for this resistance is challenges in charging a fee from clients. “Many of my clients have been with me for years and I think they would not be comfortable if I charge fee for advice. Unless it is mandatory, I am more than happy to continue as mutual fund distributor,” said Nisreen Mamaji of MoneyWorks Financial Advisors.

    SEBI data shows that many corporates and fintech companies are becoming RIAs. “One can see a lot of traction from fintech companies and equity research firms. In addition, some corporates who have not registered as RIAs are doing so to become compliant. However, the model is still not attractive for individuals,” said Rohit Shah, CEO, GettingYouRich.com.   

    Seconding Rohit, Suresh said, “The internet penetration in the country has increased. Many fintech companies feel that this is the right time to enter the online advisory model. Many of them recommend direct plans to their clients.”

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    2 Comments
    Harsh · 6 years ago `
    With 2% penetration of mutual funds, moving to 100% fee based advisory is a distant dream. Besides, the regulator is unnecessarily creating confusion by trying to “Super Impose” a particular revenue model. Free markets allow all forms of pricing models. People who have mis-sold Financial products in the past be it Insurance or Mutual Funds are already paying the price as they are not getting new investors & are losing existing clients to good quality mutual Fund distributors.

    Forcing RIA model just because of a few misselling cases by few big distributors is not good.

    Regulator should actually look at the proportion of “Close ended” schemes being sold by big distributors compared to a regular IFAs to get an answer as to which category of distributors are mis-sellers and who needs to be “forced” to become RIAs
    Ramkumar · 6 years ago
    On the one hand regulator try to encourage fee base advisory model the other hand they are allow to launch so many close ended scheme one after another on the exactly same these. These close ended scheme sold by whom need to check by regulators. Why regulator allow to launch close ended scheme. What is the purpose. Who’s are selling.

    I think in regulator there is also divided opinion and lobbying.

    Ram agrawal
    Reply
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.