SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News If implemented, a flat 1.75% expense ratio will be a ‘double whammy’ for the industry

    If implemented, a flat 1.75% expense ratio will be a ‘double whammy’ for the industry

    SEBI is reportedly mulling a proposal to cut down expense ratio to 1.75% and if accepted, the industry could face some tough times ahead
    Ravi Samalad Jul 21, 2011

    SEBI is reportedly mulling a proposal to cut down expense ratio to 1.75% and if accepted, the industry could face some tough times ahead

    SEBIMumbai: The entire mutual fund industry would be adversely affected if SEBI brings down expense ratio to 1.75% from 2.50% for equity schemes, say industry sources. Moreover, the move to make brokerage a part of the fund expenses would compound the problems of the industry.

    SEBI is reportedly mulling a proposal made earlier by the MF Advisory Committee to reduce the expense ratio from 2.5% to 1.75%. Further, the committee is said to have recommended that brokerage cost be made a part of the total expense ratio of a scheme.

    A CEO of a fund house tells us that SEBI is unlikely to go ahead with this move.

    “The facts have been presented to SEBI. According to me, expense ratio is unlikely to come down. SEBI was trying to figure out whether there is a possibility or not but the data which has been presented clearly makes it an impossible case. You cannot have one cost for all AMCs. The cost economics are different for all AMCs, be it large, small or new players,” says this CEO, requesting anonymity.                                                          

    If SEBI were to accept this proposal, AMCs would have to pay brokerage and STT from the expense ratio itself. Currently brokerage and STT forms a part of ‘cost of investments’ and is not a part of annual expense ratio.

    Sources say that the proposal has not been accepted yet. They say that if SEBI accepts this proposal, it would further strain the profitability of the industry. Given the thin margins in the business, even large fund houses would struggle to remain profitable if brokerage is made part of annual expenses.

    “The smaller AMCs will face the music even more. It will, however, help indirectly control portfolio churning. If expenses come down, fund managers will not churn more,” says a CEO of a mid-sized fund house.

    Annual expense of an equity scheme

    Net Assets

    Maximum Expense %

    Upto Rs. 100 crores

    2.50%

    Upto Rs. 300 crores

    2.25%

    Upto Rs. 100 crores

    2.00%

    Balance

    1.75%

    wives who cheat on husbands wife cheated
    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    0 Comment
    Be the first to comment.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.