SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • Insurance Life insurance commissions are rationalized in the second exposure draft, says experts

    Life insurance commissions are rationalized in the second exposure draft, says experts

    Insurers unhappy with the introduction of minimum guaranteed surrender value.
    Pallabika Aug 24, 2012

    Insurers unhappy with the introduction of minimum guaranteed surrender value.

    IRDA recently circulated the second exposure draft on product design and pricing and most of the insurers are satisfied with regulator’s guidelines. According to the insurers, IRDA has looked into traditional policies closely and tried to simplify it for the customers, stopped NAV guaranteed products, introduced pricing innovation method and rationalized commissions for insurance distributors.

    “In the new draft commissions have been rationalized i.e. long term policies will be paid higher commission while the short term policies will be paid lower commissions. So, most of the distributors will try to bank on long term policies,” says CEO and MD of a top insurance company.

    However, insurance players are unhappy with the minimum guaranteed surrender value. “IRDA has simplified traditional products which will definitely benefit the consumers but the minimum guaranteed surrender value might affect the balance sheets of insurers,” says Nandagopal, CEO Indiafirst Life Insurance.

    Currently, the minimum guaranteed surrender value is 30 percent of the total premium paid, minus the first year premium. But according to the exposure draft following slab is recommended:

    For second and third year, it will be 50% of the total premium paid. For fourth year, it will be 75% of the total premium paid. For fifth and sixth year it will be 90% of the total premium paid, and from seventh year onwards, it will be 100% of the total premium paid.

    According to the industry officials, it will hurt their earnings. They are planning to approach the regulator to discuss the matter. 

    Ashvin Parekh, Partner, Ernst & Young said that insurers recover the cost of intermediation and also the overheads out of the premium collected. Therefore, to disturb the structure might affect the company’s earnings.

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    0 Comment
    Be the first to comment.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.