SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News SEBI requests SC to allow them to start afresh on SRO for MF distributors

    SEBI requests SC to allow them to start afresh on SRO for MF distributors

    The apex court has reportedly asked the market regulator to explain the rationale for the request.
    Nishant Patnaik Sep 27, 2017

    SEBI has requested the Supreme Court to allow them to start afresh the appointment on self regulatory organisation (SRO) of mutual fund distributors.

    The court has reportedly asked the market regulator to submit an application explaining to them why there is a need to introduce an SRO for the mutual fund distributors.

    In the latest hearing on September 20, the apex court said, “SEBI would like to proceed in the matter afresh in view of the period of time that has elapsed in the meantime (three   years)   and   many   other   entities have become eligible in the meantime. The SEBI is permitted to bring the aforesaid   developments   on   record   and   file   an application with the aforesaid prayer(s), which would be considered once such an application is filed. Registry is directed to list the application immediately after such an application is filed.”

    As the name suggests, SRO or self regulatory organisation for mutual fund distributors will be responsible for micro-regulations of its members (MF distributors). The SRO will spread awareness about mutual funds among people, educate and train distributors and conduct screening test for them.

    Earlier, SEBI had invited applications for SRO in March 2013. The market regulator has given its go ahead to AMFI promoted Institution of Mutual Funds Intermediaries (IMFI) to form SRO in February 2014.

    There were two more applicants in the race for SRO - Organization of Financial Distributors (OFD) floated by Financial Intermediaries Association of India (FIAI) and Financial Planning Standards Board of India. While AMFI is the trade body of mutual fund manufacturers (albeit with the responsibility of distributor registrations), FIAI is an association of 15 large distributors and FPSB provides CFP certification.

    In March 2014, Financial Planning Supervisory Foundation (FPSF) had filed the appeal against SEBI with Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). After many hearings, SAT had quashed SEBI’s decision to grant in-principle approval to IMFI to act as an SRO for the mutual fund distributors. SAT has asked the market regulator to start the selection procedure afresh in September 2015. 

    Recently, the RBI committee headed by Dr. Tarun Ramadorai, Professor of Financial Economics, Imperial college London has proposed introduction of SRO to grant license to distributors. It said, “We propose the creation of a unique ‘license number’ for financial advisors to replace the diversity of current registrations such as the ARN, RIA, RA, and EUIN number. An SRO-driven regulatory system for financial advisors across all products will use this unified identification number.”

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    5 Comments
    Ramamoorthy.G · 6 years ago `
    Good move. Don't know how long it takes to shape.
    Jaideep · 6 years ago `
    What is important is that, besides investors, the interests of distributors, especially IFAs who deal with retail customers should be fairly addressed. In fact, FPSB should not be allowed to even apply for an SRO because it does not include or address the distribution fraternity at all in its activities.
    Rahul amffa · 6 years ago `
    A very good move. But part of the National Distributors must be limited including Cams & Karvy. Unless policies may be benefited to creamy layer. Thanks
    Gautam Lulla · 6 years ago `
    The idea of creating a unique ‘license number’ for ALL financial advisors makes the sense.

    Including Insurance Agents should also be taken under consideration as it would be step towards standardization and SRO will be in better position to REGULATE.

    Current proposal in the MF Industry is bizarre, distributor can't advice, advisor can't distributor while insurance agent doesn't comes under these proposals but they can keep on advising on ULIPs which deals with equity investments.

    If Insurance industry comes under this unique ‘license number’ it'll surely be able to better regulate the mega industry of bancassurance as well which has reputation of bring (if I can express mildly) little too aggressive .

    Well these are just my personal views, would appreciate to know yours as well.

    Thanks,
    Gautam Lulla
    Manas Paul · 6 years ago `
    Don't invest in mutual fund through equity funds see the China stock market it has made a peak hand is cut into slices now.
    It is impossible to get to that level. Indian stock market too has made a peak so be careful you won't see these levels till 7 or 8 years. Economy is already toiled. Sell your holdings & shift to fixed instruments
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.