SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News ‘Distributors need to ensure that right risks are communicated’

    ‘Distributors need to ensure that right risks are communicated’

    CII whitepaper notes that risk management by distributors is an important aspect to keep alive investor trust in mutual funds. It also highlights important steps that credit rating agencies and AMCs should take to avoid credit events.
    Team Cafemutual Jul 21, 2020

    In the light of the recent credit events that jolted the mutual fund industry, Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) has suggested that distributors need to ensure that the right risks are communicated to clients.

    "Distributors need to ensure that the right risks are communicated. If debt products are being marketed as likely to have improved returns over FDs, it must be appropriately identified that debt portfolios are marred with non-zero credit risk, which may play out. Similar scenarios play out with duration-based products as well," notes the 14th CII Mutual Fund Summit whitepaper.

    The vision document further notes that risk management by distributors is an important aspect to keep alive investor trust in mutual funds.

    CII’s whitepaper also highlighted the steps that credit rating agencies and AMCs should take to avoid credit events.

    The whitepaper has advised AMCs to build internal capabilities to assess risk better, instead of solely relying on credit agencies.

    "Own due diligence is essential. Many AMCs are bank-backed and can have additional sources of portfolio intelligence. Further, AMCs need to strengthen their legal teams, strengthen the role of debenture trustees and strengthen internal documentation," notes the whitepaper.

    Further, the document notes that fund managers should be measured on the right set of metrics to follow risk adjusted returns on portfolios.  It also recommends strict reviews of concentration norms on portfolios.

    The whitepaper also suggests ranking should not be stressed while promoting liquid products. "The importance of quartiles while promoting liquid products should be significantly downplayed, as it goes against the objectives of these fund categories since investors are primarily looking at safety and consistency in returns in short term," notes the document.

    In case of credit rating agencies, the whitepaper highlights the need for CRAs to be more careful in their approach.

    "A lot of measures have been put in by the regulator on the role of credit rating agencies and the processes they need to follow. However it is equally imperative that credit rating agencies learn from their vast experience, build models that more accurately derive ratings and have stronger data-backed disclosures," notes the document.

    Credit rating agencies also need to upgrade market intelligence to accurately reflect current macro and player-specific scenarios.

     

     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    6 Comments
    K V RAGHUPATHI · 3 years ago `
    Of course it is the objective of the distributors to understand and explain risk of any fund to investors.

    AMCs also have an obligation both to investors and distributors on their fund investment philosophy.

    For example, in case of BANKING AND PSU DEBT FUND, the flavour of the day, many AMCs hold portfolio to an alarming extent of around 15% which are neither Banking nor PSU. The distributors and investors are made fools when we are advice such funds which have glaring exposure beyond bracket of which itself is the RISK.

    On my inquiry with AMCs, I am informed that SEBI has allowed them to look beyond bracket as an opportunity. Fund Manager’s conscious should rule rather than whether SEBI has allowed it or not. When a fund is formed as BANKING AND PSU DEBT FUND, they should stick to its parameters. More and more they liberate themselves on investment priorities, sure to land in problems. Then the casualties are the investors and advisors.
    abdullah ibrahim · 3 years ago `
    Do you need Finance?
    Are you looking for Finance?
    Are you looking for a money to enlarge your business?
    We help individuals and companies to obtain loan for business
    expanding and to setup a new business ranging any amount. Get a
    loan at affordable interest rate of 2%, Do you need this cash/loan
    for business and to clear your bills? Then send us an email now
    for more information contact us now whatspp Number +918929490461
    Contact Us At : abdullahibrahimlender@gmail.com
    Mr Abdullah Ibrahim
    Srinivasa · 3 years ago `
    Of course,MFDs explain the risk involved in various debt funds.( By the way MFDs are NOT supposed to do risk profiling,advising etc.,They should only execute !! ).Based on time horizon of the investor,suitable funds are matched & invested.To that extent,i think,MFDs are doing good job.what next?are Fund managers are sticking to the funds objective/time horizon?have they have invested in long term,low rated ,unheard companies`debt instruments in Ultra short term/low duration funds?Who is letting down the investors & not sticking to fund`s mandate?The recent funds winding up fiasco is a case in point.We donot know how many skeletons are there?With interest rate falling,MF debt schemes pathetic picture-No wonder,investors in a state of between DEEP BLUE SEA & DEVIL!!
    Rajarao · 3 years ago `
    This is a ridiculous statement by CII. Fund managers default on deliveriging safety in ultra short duration funds , these areticle say about risk management by distributrs! Who controls the portfolio? Is it distributor or the Fund manager?Looks like the industry is trying find the Bakara - called the distributor. What all therese highly qualified finance graduates - MBAs , CAS , CFA doing sitting the HOS of the AMCs? The responsibility of credit rating and ensuring the liquidity of the portfolio is entirely with the AMC and the fund managers only - SEBI shall tighten this responsibility squarely in the neck of the AMC , by putting in rules like : every AMC must maintain the history of Hair Cuts , since inception of the AMC on their web site. Also , when ever credit risk occurs , a certain portion of the credit risk must be borne by the AMC etc.As the risk is that of investors , and the loss of brand name is to Distributors( interetingly , CII also trying to rescue AMCs, and negatively brand the distributor) , fund managers are taking un due risks while diploying these funds in the market. Distributor can not be a watch dog over the AMC or Fundmanager. But we must thank SEBI for bringing in the concept of side pocket , by which the credit risk events now are in the public notice , while , they were scilently adjusted in the NAVs earlier.
    That said , Yes , the distributors have to understand that Debt funds are not safe. Neither they add any value to the portfolio of the investor in the long run . Hence , not distributing the debt portion , including the balanced funds is the best call.Abondon these bull shit debt funds!
    Uday Desai · 3 years ago
    I 100 % agree but when SEBI person will agree that as a distributor we no right to control any schemes portfolio only AMC and a Fund Manager is managing port folio , in this case are just a BAKRA for sebi person
    Reply
    Uday Desai · 3 years ago `
    Dear ,
    I personally appreciate the stop of cii in favour of investor's risk while doing investment in mutual fund , as such as a distributor do a miss selling with a client he will not got any new business from such group of clients , but I had find one loop hole in case of bank , bank person does a sale of debt fund as FD and innocent , senior citizens are at least not aware that their money will invested in mutual fund as this innocent investor were cheated by banker or employee , I request to cafe mutual team do some a ton or focus this cheating and bring this to sebi because as distributor SEBI not hearing our request . And do take some steing and strong action in favour of distributor. Thank full of you
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.