SUBSCRIBE NEWSLETTER
  • Change Language
  • English
  • Hindi
  • Marathi
  • Gujarati
  • Punjabi
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Bengali
  • MF News SEBI has received 61 RIA applications so far in 2016

    SEBI has received 61 RIA applications so far in 2016

    SEBI data shows that the number of RIA applicants is increasing steadily over the last two years.
    Ravi Samalad May 21, 2016

    Thanks to SEBI’s vigilance and crackdown on erring entities offering investment advice without registering with the regulator, many entities have applied to SEBI to register as RIA.

    SEBI data shows that the number of RIA applications are increasing steadily since the last two years. In 2014, only two entities approached SEBI to register as RIA. In 2015, this number increased to 25.

    In the current calendar year so far, as many as 61 entities, including individuals have filed applications with SEBI to register as RIA.

    When SEBI introduced RIA regulations in 2013, around 100 entities registered themselves with SEBI in the first few months. The number has since then gone up to 367. As on April 2016, 88 applications are pending with SEBI to receive RIA license.

    Industry experts say the number of RIAs is increasing due to a number of reasons. Apart from preferring to be on the right side of the law, some are self-motivated to register as RIA as they believe it gives them an edge over others.

    While the RIA registrations are growing, the growth is still minuscule, say distributors. They say that the application and compliance costs are too high for anyone to register as RIA.

    In 2014, SEBI raised the application fee for corporates and LLPs. Now, corporates and limited liability partners have to cough up Rs. 25,000 as application fee and Rs. 5 lakh as registration and renewal fee. Earlier, they had to pay Rs. 5,000 as application fee and Rs. 1 lakh as registration fee. Advisors have to pay the renewal fee every five years to retain their license.

     

    Share your views.
     

    Have a query or a doubt?
    Need a clarification or more information on an issue?
    Cafemutual welcomes all mutual fund and insurance related questions. So write in to us at newsdesk@cafemutual.com

    Click to clap
    Disclaimer: Cafemutual is an industry platform of mutual fund professionals. Our visitors are requested to maintain the decorum of the platform when expressing their thoughts and commenting on articles. Viewers are advised to refrain from making defamatory allegations against individuals. Those making abusive language or defamatory allegations will be blocked from accessing the web site.
    6 Comments
    Nalli Surendra · 8 years ago `
    The fee structure is too steep even for a established class advisors; However, due to the high handedness of SEBI, people are forced to pay & register as they want to be on the right side of the law. In a country where there is no respect for advise & fee, this initiative & the costs associated is too unjust not only for the service provider and also for the industry per se.... Financial inclusion can only happen if the regulator acts as a catalyst, not as a dictator. And somehow smell that there is moral hazard at Regulator end in killing MF Industry in favour of Life Insurance companies..
    Rajesh Sharma · 8 years ago `
    Completely Agree with you Mr Nalli Surendra, SEBI is not at all acting as a catalyst but to create hurdle in the growth of the Industry. This is why they kept a high fee of Rs 5 Lacs + Rs 25 k appplication . They are acting like Hitler....leaving no option but to pay...kind of Lagaan. Motto is nothing but to kill the MF Industry. I think Subramanian Swamy asked Govt to sack U K Sinha first, before Raghuram Rajan. Due to his wrong steps only Industry is not able to touch the peak of its client base of 2011.
    Pravin Jain · 8 years ago `
    SEBI's registration fee for both individual and corporate(including LLP) is quite high, especially when one is following "fee only" model. Besides, while SEBI is granting registration for five years, the underlying NISM exam certification is valid only for three years. SEBI being an important stakeholder in NISM, must look at synchronising the both.
    prakash · 8 years ago
    Agreed the fees are a deterrent!
    Reply
    ekta thaker CFPcm · 8 years ago `
    first thing SEBI needs to do is keep one common certificate for one kind of profile. So many exams and aspirants keep giving all and get out of focus , which sector to focus. To register as RIA instead of charging so much , keep the criteria of AUM and number of years of experience.
    Rajesh pandey · 8 years ago `
    I am alsow agreed with n surendra. SEBI Work is not good for MF industry SEBI confused his own rule it's taken mix rule all over word and it's like khichadi. SEBI not work for invester he wants die invester advisor as well as MF industry. When about 125000 Arn only work 25000 arn in MF bcasuse of his fast changes rule. If 25 thousand arn's not work well as SEBI Notice then only few RIA how can work for MF.
    Login or Sign up to post comments.
    More than 2,07,000 of your industry peers are staying on top of their game by receiving daily tips, ideas and articles on growth strategies. Join them and stay updated by subscribing to Cafemutual newsletters.

    Fill in the below details or write to newsdesk@cafemutual.com and subscribe to Cafemutual Newsletter now.
    Cafemutual is an independent media platform and focuses on providing knowledge and information for the benefit of finance professionals. We do not promote any particular brand or asset category.